User talk:Sabantui

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Spluiden
Hello, Sabantui. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Elizabeth Spluiden, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Elizabeth Spluiden to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD and I wanted to let you know that it has been replaced. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Spluiden


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Elizabeth Spluiden, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tatewaki (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

As an admin of the Russian Wikipedia, have to clarify for the local admins that it does not just lack references but is a blatant hoax that was already deleted several times as such from our language section. The latest repost was today and the possibility to look up the deletion history was masked by author by replacing several Cyrillic letters in the title with similarly looking Latin letters (I think that pretty much reveals the intents of the contributor) Tatewaki (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)