User talk:Sabina Bajracharya

Welcome Sabina Bajracharya! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello Sabina Bajracharya. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, SUN EYE 1  11:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)    [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suneye1&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

May 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rose. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''... and many of your new article edits. Please see WP:NOTGALLERY. The encyclopedia is not intended as a photo album for your favorite pictures. Please use images only to highlight unique features of the article topics. '' Zefr (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Identification of photo
Hi, sorry, I first said that File:Echinocereus cactus.jpg was a Haworthia, but it is actually Aristaloe aristata, which I should have spotted immediately, as I grow it. Compare your photo to File:AristAloe aristata - sutherland variety.jpg. Peter coxhead (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload unencyclopedic images, as you did at Bougainvillea, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop adding your personal image files to articles when there are already plentiful images for the topic. When you choose images, think first if they are adding unique information for the article. You appear to be using Wikipedia to upload your favorite pictures; WP:NOTGALLERY. '' Zefr (talk) 15:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * May I second the message immediately above. Please do not add images just because you have some good photos. Only add photos if they add something to the article which isn't already there and it provides more encyclopaedic value. We often have far too many photos in articles, especially those about flowering plants. Adding extra ones, especially where they are technically inferior to those already present, is disruptive and just causes extra work for other editors. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 16:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello,, Sorry for the inconvenience caused due to my current edits on Wikipedia articles. I am a new user on Wikipedia from Nepal. Since from my current edits being reverted time and again I have found out that I do not have enough knowledge about adding useful images and editing Wikipedia articles. So, I would like to know what kind of images are useful for Wikipedia articles especially related to Flora and Fauna, and want to know more about the useful ways of editing Wikipedia articles. Also, I would like to thank both of you for letting me know my mistakes and helping me out. -- Sabina Bajracharya (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * You appear to have diverse photographic interests in botany and insects, and your pictures are mostly excellent in quality. So there is certainly value you offer the encyclopedia. But to date, the main impression one would have on reviewing your additions of pictures to various article galleries is that you are depositing your favorite images there, much like one would do in creating a personal album. WP:NOTGALLERY explains why this is discouraged; too many pictures dilute attention to the purpose of the encyclopedia: giving precise knowledge about the article subject. I suggest you ask yourself before adding an image: "is this unique in some way, does it highlight a feature explained in the article (that can be captured in the caption) or add unique knowledge through the picture?" In other words, challenge yourself to be selective and encyclopedic - that is, use adding a picture to create educational information. Good luck. Zefr (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


 * May I also add that Wikipedia has relatively few good quality images of topics in Nepal, except for the obvious tourist hot-spots, We are also often missing important images of native plants, especially images that help in identification such as good images of leaves, flowering parts, seeds etc. Many native plants are not as showy or glamorous as their horticultural cousins but are equally important - they do not to be precisely identified - having the wrong image attributed to a plant is most unhelpful! Regards  Velella  Velella Talk 15:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)