User talk:Sabinhavenless23

File source problem with File:WarriorWrestler.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WarriorWrestler.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Championships and accomplishments sections
Hi there! Please just note that the promotions in the "Championships and accomplishments" sections are listed alphabetically, so I have reverted this edit of yours. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've reverted the changes you made to the section of the Warrior (wrestler) article. The various promotions and championships in the section are supposed to be listed alphabetically. The titles are also listed as the promotion calls them, not necessarily by the words that are actually written on the belts.Odin&#39;s Beard (talk) 03:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Warrior
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Darrenhusted (talk) 18:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Sock Puppets
It is a serious offence to try to continue making reverts using a sock puppet. I suggest you back off from editing the Warrior page. You and "CV32". Darrenhusted (talk) 19:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Osaka Pro Wrestling Championship
An article that you have been involved in editing, Osaka Pro Wrestling Championship, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Will C  04:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Hell Demons for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hell Demons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hell Demons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)