User talk:SabyasachiMukherjee911

Welcome!
Hello, SabyasachiMukherjee911, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Liz Read! Talk! 14:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Height edits
Hello. The height parameter in person infoboxes is for individuals who are notable for their height, or their height is otherwise relevant, per reliable source. See Template:Infobox_person. Moreover, information needs to be verifiable, with reliable sources. Lapadite (talk) 08:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I have to echo Lapadite77. Height is irrelevant for actors and actresses. This information and other personal details might be appropriate for a fan website but not Wikipedia. Liz  Read! Talk! 14:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Lonely Resurrection
Hello, SabyasachiMukherjee911. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, A Lonely Resurrection, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. — swpb T 13:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A Lonely Resurrection


A tag has been placed on A Lonely Resurrection requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00M4LHQAU. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 16:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about A Lonely Resurrection
Hello, SabyasachiMukherjee911,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether A Lonely Resurrection should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/A Lonely Resurrection.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, — swpb T 12:43, 14 April 2016 (UTC)