User talk:Sac87873

hey, i can't say i agree with everything at the Mark Yudof article. It reads a little like a campaign biography, like especially in discussing the budget crisis. Also, what criteria did you use in determining relevance. I would say salary is at least as relevant as winning the Times' award. Also, why were controversies removed? I think a lot of the neutral point of view has been lost in the changes you made. --Donselma (talk) 16:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reconsider !  05:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC)