User talk:SacState2020/sandbox/Fountain of Neptune, Florence

There is a great amount of detail regarding the mythology of the sculpture. It is great how you described it piece by piece because it reflects the most important information.
 * A lead section that is easy to understand

Very clear structure, I was able to understand it from start to finish of the mythology section. Just a suggestion, the last sentence of the section when you placed, “Both the crown and the lash were a reference to earthly rulers, making this specific representation of Neptune symbolic of a contemporary ruler i.e. Cosimo de Medici, rather than an Olympian deity”. I really liked how you discreetly introduced the patron Cosimo de Medici but I think it would be a smooth transition if you place the Patron section after the mythology section.
 * A clear structure

It is pleasing to read that each section is equal in length and nothing is of unimportance, there is nothing left out from the published literature. The conclusions you provided did not sound convincing rather it was very informative.
 * Balances coverage

The phrases are very neutral and are a reflection of various aspects.
 * Neutral Content

The sources are reliable sources like JSTOR but for number, “10” I had to log in to obtain access to read the rest of the article.
 * Reliable sources