User talk:Sacha Sach

January 2015
Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sikhism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Every statement you added must have a source. Neil N  talk to me 04:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Indira Gandhi, you may be blocked from editing. Neil N  talk to me 15:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 15:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Indira Gandhi. Neil N  talk to me 17:29, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Edits of Sacha Sach. Thank you. <b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 17:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * We welcome all contributions, but Wikipedia articles are not soapboxes to express your opinions or air grievances. Material must be sourced and must maintain a neutral point of view. Failure to follow these policies can and will get your account blocked indefinitely, rather than just 24 hours. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Sacha Sach back. Thank you. <b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 01:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm Omni Flames. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Australia–India relations, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Omni Flames  let's talk about it  22:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Kaobear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Germany–India relations has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 16:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

I undid the revert that I made on your edit.

July 2016
Hello, I'm MorbidEntree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to France–India relations have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MorbidEntree-(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) (Contribs) (please reply using ) 22:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. <b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 03:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 02:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Note that similar edits in the future will result in a longer block. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 03:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

You are exercising dictatorship by blocking the widely reported facts in western newspapers about Drug running and violence in the Sikh community. Are you on their payroll? Sacha Sach (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * "widely reported facts in western newspapers" - links to reliable sources please? --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 16:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, I'm NewEnglandYankee. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Germany–India relations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 02:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Germany–India relations. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:35, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Germany–India relations was changed by Sacha Sach (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920784 on 2018-08-16T21:35:25+00:00.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Germany–India relations. Adamgerber80 (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I wish we had blocked you indefinitely years ago. You have been adding inept, racist, and nationalist commentary for four years. Drmies (talk) 01:09, 24 October 2019 (UTC)