User talk:Sachaai

Welcome
Hello, Sachaai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Vaghela dynasty have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 10:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Vaghela dynasty
Muhandes, Can you please verify why you are changing back " vaghela dynasty" material? Do you have sufficient information about "vaghela" family that since you cannot find online information about it, you are bent on reducing the information? A lot of genealogy information was there even before I had seen the webpage and yes there were a lot of versions which used a lot of self praising verbs. I went ahead and removed those words and corrected the grammar. But the genealogical information is good. Also the place dholka and the dilwara temples information is good. Its very hard to get official references, but if you search enough then you get tiny tiny information. And I know more than 50 families of the vaghela family tree and this information is relevant from information passed through generations. Why are you trying to enforce your thoughts and deny others who are seeking information about their own culture?

I appreciate your work that you try to correct grammatical mistakes and relevant information in many many webpages, but over here, you are trying to enforce your own opinion in what I am assuming that you are not an expert yourself for Vaghela, i.e. are you a Vaghela, do you know anyone Vaghela? Do you know where they come from? I can play the same game as you are doing about placing this page in my watchlist and keep on changing what you have changed and your other webpages, but I do not want to do it, because thats not right. What do you want? I dont have official references; does that mean you will take out millions of other webpages out since you did not find online information about it???

Take alook at the following links what I found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Gujarat http://www.yponder.com/index.php/history?start=5 http://www.maheronline.org/history/surnames/163-solanki-rajputs https://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=87718184801&topic=19700#!/topic.php?uid=5033252963&topic=9816 http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/621483/Karnadeva-Vaghela http://www.rajputsamaj.com/Surname.aspx http://www.bharatonline.com/gujarat/travel/ahmedabad/adalaj-vav.html http://books.google.com/books?id=61fSwBF4bbYC&pg=PA22&dq=vaghela+gujarat&hl=en&ei=cLVyToudLdPG0AHD4MWACg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=vaghela%20gujarat&f=false http://books.google.com/books?ei=7LVyTt37COzG0AGxheXMDg&ct=result&id=-0pAAAAAMAAJ&dq=history+of+gujarat&q=vaghela

Sachaai (talk) 02:38, 16 September 2011 (UTC)sachaai


 * The most basic Wikipedia policy requires everything to be verifiable. If you don't have a reliable source, don't add the material, else it will be reverted. If you do have a reliable source, add a proper citation. That has nothing to do with my opinion or expertise, it is the simplest and most basic policy of Wikipedia.
 * If you want to follow my every edit and point out any unsourced material I add, you are not only welcome, I will most appreciate it. A second pair of eyes making sure I add only well sourced material is a gift which I will not refuse, nor will any reasonable Wikipedia editor. Thanks in advance if you choose to do it.
 * As clearly you are new to Wikipedia, I am also willing to help you with this specific article. If you have specific information with reliable sources, and are not at ease with the technicalities of adding it, let me know and I will do my best to add it for you. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2011 (UTC)