User talk:Sachinvenga/Archive 1


 * }

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. - F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 18:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Honorifics in article headings
Hi Sachinvenga! Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks a lot for your contribution to the articles regarding Western Maharashtra. We really have very few users hailing from that region who can contribute quality information to those articles.

However, I would like to let you know that I have moved back the article Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil to the article name Bhaurao Patil. As a policy, we do not mention honorific titles in the article titles. For example, we don't use the names Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Mahatma Phule, Rajarshi Shahu, Babasaheb Ambedkar, Maharshi Vitthal Ramji Shinde, etc. I know we have a lot of respect for these legends. We ourselves have given these honorific titles to them as a token of our love. But Wikipedia is in encyclopedia and we should keep our emotions apart when contributing to it. It also makes the article to look more neutral and so creates more chance for regarding it as reliable source for other neutral users.

I expect you to have a brilliant future on Wikipedia. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or need any help.

Shivashree (talk) 10:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Duplicate tags
Hi Sachinvenga, just thought I'd let you know that when tagging articles its best to avoid duplicates especially when they are contradictory. For example you tagged Acharya Dhramendra with refimprove, refimproveBLP and unreferencedBLP along with several other tags. Refimprove and refimproveBLP are alternate versions depending on whether or not a poorly referenced article is a biography of a living person, and unreferenced is for unreferenced as opposed to poorly or partially referenced articles. So no more than one of those three tags could be correct for any one article.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  17:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for Enlightening !!--Shlok 17:26, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Incidentally I see you are in India, do you edit in any of the Indian languages? I'm running a little project that would like to get more of the Indian language wikis to feed data into and extract reports from.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  17:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Definitely, I can handle in at list one Indian language Marathi, kindly explains me the project.--Shlok 18:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, the idea is to use a program to check for the different languages of wikipedia to identify people who are dead in one language version but not in another. So at meta:Death_anomalies_table we have a list of categories of dead people from about seventy language versions of wikipedia. If Marathi is MR then we don't yet have its equivalent of category:Deaths_by_year on the table, if we can add it then if the Marathi wikipedia is updated with someone's death then any other language that has an article on that person could get them on an anomaly list. Also anyone on the Marathi project could then request a report of people who are alive according to the Marathi wikipedia but dead according to one of the other pedias. So far we've used this to fix at least four hundred anomalies on the English Wikipedia.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  20:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Ichalkaranji Municipal Office 1932.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Ichalkaranji Municipal Office 1932.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Will do soon --Shlok 09:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

AFD closed
Just wanted to let you know I went ahead and closed the AfD. The other editor who voted to delete still may decide to take it to deletion review, but I doubt it. You should be all set to start a DYK nomination. Thanks for your work on improving the article! Kafziel Complaint Department 01:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I noticed you were unsure how to nominate the article for a spot at "Did You Know". I was going to do it for you, but I found that the image in the article is not properly sourced. When you uploaded it, you claimed it as your own work (which is extremely unlikely, since it was taken at least 80 years ago) and you also released it into the public domain under "life of the author + 70 years" which can't be verified without knowing who actually took the photo and when they died. Unless we can correct that it probably won't be selected for DYK. If you can tell me where you found the photo, I can try to help you fix it. Kafziel Complaint Department 04:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

http://www.pinet.on.ca/peeldiglib/Page.asp?PageID=9135
 * Okay, I'm going to have it deleted from Wikimedia Commons and will re-upload here with the correct Fair Use copyright tag. Kafziel Complaint Department 12:28, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Fixed the image and nominated for DYK. You can see the nomination here. Kafziel Complaint Department 16:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of William James Wanless
Hello! Your submission of William James Wanless at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Sir Wanless in Marathi
Hi Sachin, Thanks for a nice article on Sir Wanless. We knew nothing about him and his work. I have started a one-liner stub in Marathi about him, please check it once and see if the name is correctly transcribed in Marathi (I'm not sure of Marathi pronunciation of his name). Lovingly yours, Shivashree (talk) 05:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks For the same. In fact This article should also be available in Malayalam as nursing schools at Wanless is very known in Kerala. This article is also approved In DYK. -- . Shlok  talk. 13:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * You can find someone here for Malayalam translation. It seems to be quite sluggish, but what it takes to make a try? Shivashree (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Hunter Corbett, the PC(USA), and the PCUSA.
Hunter Corbett was the moderator of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, which is one of the predecessors of the current Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). In 1956, the PCUSA and the UPNA merged to form the UPCUSA, which, in 1983, merged with the PCUS to form the PC(USA). Someone else had created the moderator list for the PC(USA), and I used that as a template to create the list for some of the predecessor denominations. I hadn't gotten to the PCUSA yet, but I intend to. You might consider creating it. The list of moderators can be found in the General Assembly minutes, which are cited for the list articles that I created.

I corrected the Hunter Corbett article. I have not removed your contribution to the moderator list, because I would rather move it to the correct list which does not yet exist. Thanks for contributing to the articles on Presbyterian History. Sterrettc (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Thats OK, as I was expecting it !! but keep in mind that much more work on History of Presbyterian needs to be be done. -- . Shlok  talk. 20:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for William James Wanless
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hunter Corbett
I nominated Hunter Corbett for a DYK: Template_talk:Did_you_know.--GrapedApe (talk) 05:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

meet ups
Namaskar,
 * Thanks for remindig me on this, I suppose I have share Google document of Pune Meet minutes to everyone attended quite a long time back, Minutes are sent on India mailing list and mr-yahoo mailing list quite some time back.
 * I have given priority to one bye one action on the points we discussed,while doing that,Yes,wikipedia meet up pages are still to be updated with the minutes,Actually Wikification of the minutes is pending.
 * On Wikipedia Academy to give practical guidance and query handling, We are likely to get opportunity to make a presentation before tech-marathi group and also womens studies centre at Pune.
 * One Marathi Wikipedian Kaustubh also is usually moving in your area so if you want to take any initative in your area of working it can be well supported no issues.Mahitgar (talk) 07:11, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

"See also" sections on William James Wanless‎ and other pages
This is currently being discussed on Talk:John Rabe. Nick Cooper (talk) 17:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Prod
Hi Sachinvenga - I'm sorry, but that's not how it works. Per WP:PROD, if a prod tag is removed from an article by any user for any reason it cannot be restored. Even if there is no discussion or you think it is bad faith, it cannot be restored. Prod is for completely uncontroversial deletions. If you still think the article should be deleted, you need to take it to WP:AFD. Dana boomer (talk) 11:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Awaaz Foundation
Hello! Your submission of Awaaz Foundation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see new note at DYK talk page. Yoninah (talk) 16:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Re photos. For the logo see WP:LOGO. The foundation authorising the photo to be used on Wikipedia is not the same as making a free photo available for use. Therefore, you will need to upload it as a copyrighted photo and add an Non-Free Fair Use Rationale - see WP:NFCC. Both of which mean that you can't use them for a picture hook at DYK. Mjroots (talk) 08:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Pune Wikipedia Meetup
Hi, I see that you attended the Pune Wikipedia Meetup last month. Please put up details of what took place in the meet. You could do it in the mammer of the report on Mumbai Meetup 2. Please also provide captions to the lineups in the images.AshLin (talk) 09:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Awaaz Foundation
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

On your deletion tags
This is with reference to your speedy deletion tags. The articles are already cited. See the link (http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071018/asp/careergraph/story_8445256.asp). Hope this helps. Sidhu Jyatha (talk) 09:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Study at the Bengal Music College, (a music training college) affiliated with the prestigious University of Calcutta is not Notability for having a Biography article on Wikipedia.
 * Wikipedia:Notability - Creative professionals
 * The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
 * The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
 * The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
 * The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.- -- . Shlok  talk. 10:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

William James Wanless GA review
I've posted a GA review for William James Wanless. The GA nomination is currently on hold until issues identified are resolved. LK (talk) 03:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Asperger syndrome
I've reverted your G1 tag on Asperger syndrome, because it was originally a user-space essay, which generally has more lenient guidelines than project space essays. I've also moved it back to the original location with a note that anyone can still edit it if they wish.  — Soap  —  15:53, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

MasterChef India
Dear Sachin, could you pls more specific, what all things are looking like advertisement in this article..?? --hari 05:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hbkrishnan (talk • contribs)


 * Amul Presents and अमूल प्रस्तुत करता है. - -- . Shlok  talk. 05:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Sharad Anantrao Joshi
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Priya Wal
Hello Sachinvenga, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Priya Wal to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Courcelles 11:18, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Indian Stammering Association
Hello! Your submission of The Indian Stammering Association at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on DYK talk page. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 09:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I went over your new refs. Two of them are not reliable sources; in fact, they don't even say what you say in the article. One is a dead link. Only one of the references, for the figure of 11-12 million, is a good one. Please look this over again. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 16:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Well done! You added really good references. Now let's finish the hook. I suggested an ALT2 hook on the DYK page which mentions how many stammerers there are in India, but it doesn't seem as "hooky" as ALT1. What do you think? Yoninah (talk) 10:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Indian Stammering Association
Gatoclass (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Great work
Hey, just wanted to appreciate your work on Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project, great work there, cheers KuwarOnline Talk''' 12:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, We need to make this to DYK. -- . Shlok  talk. 12:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * या विषयाशी माझा परिचय बेताचाच आहे पण जमेल तसा प्रयत्न नक्कीच करेन . Mahitgar (talk) 13:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

PuneGarbage.org
PuneGarbage.org link was added to "Pune" article. May I know the reason for deleting the same? Isn't the issue important for Pune and its sustainance? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaheer.in (talk • contribs) 10:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

We have added it again. Please dont delete. If you have any isues or dont know about the subject then first let us knw. We are there to clear all your doubts. - Team PuneGarbage.org (Pune, India) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaheer.in (talk • contribs) 10:33, 6 December 2010

Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project
Can you take a look at T:TDYK? Thanks SmartSE (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Venkat Bedre
Hello Sachinvenga. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Venkat Bedre, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Elected politician is enough for A7, PROD or take to AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK  10:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

jaitapur
see the template of nuclear power plant in india, please......--Dwalin (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * your action is like to be considered as vandalism--Dwalin (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello Sachinvenga, please don't add wikilinks into article there have nothing to do with the project. So if you want to add wikilinks to the article, please describe why or how far the plant has to do with the article. And please stop your edit war, if you have no arguments for your wikilinks in these articles. Best regards ChNPP (talk) 14:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * aren't you able to read? i told (except in last, because you didn't read the first, the second, the third.....you never......--Dwalin (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello Sachinvenga you asked me what kind of information are not specific in the article of the Jaitapur NPP. I also think, many of the sentences read like a not neutral promotion. The deleted sentences contain only information about the general design of the EPR, so the datas can not use for this article, because all four units of the EPR-Type where under construction in China, Finnland and France has a lot of modifications, i.a. differents in power output, nominal thermal rector power, safety systems modifications. The Flamanville-3 reactor plant has the original control system, Olkiluoto-3 has a modified version. The Taishan reactors use a homemade product of China. So these mainly not specific informations, i.a. the section about safety, competitiveness and flexibility are better placed in the article of the European Pressurized Reactor, the information about the other plants (in section Opponents) are better places in the article about the two plants. But thats important informations, and should not to be delete. The next problem is your see also lists, but not only in the article about the Jaitapur plant. Please add wikilinks into the sections, so you have made some same links where you added into the see also list, i.a. Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant. These double placed links are not required. Some topic close wikilinks or external links are enough, but you don't need placed a wikilink in oder to all articles, who have not directly to do with the article or the content. Thats the most problems I found in your Edits in this case of the Jaitapur NPP. Please note these little things, and a resultat of objective discussion is the best way to prevent a edit war. Please note this. Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 12:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

December 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC) During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
 * I have also removed your access to the rollback tool at the time for using it in an edit war. Rollback is to be used only for obvious vandalism, and the edits you were reverting did not fall under that classification. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Online Ambassador interest
Hi! Thanks for signing the Online Ambassador interest list. We're gearing up for the next term right now, and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program will be supporting considerably more courses, with considerably more student activity... possibly upwards of 500 students who will need mentors.

If you're still interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones). If you have any questions, please let me know.

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 22:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Indian Stammering Association
Hi. I've posted a comment here: Talk:The_Indian_Stammering_Association. Thanks for your attention. Spicemix (talk) 07:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
Per your request, I have given you back rollback. Let me reiterate that it is to be used only for blatant vandalism and other clearly unproductive edits, and should you misuse it again, it will be swiftly removed. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Narayan Shripad Rajhans
A move discussion is initiated at the Talk page of Narayan Shripad Rajhans, a page you recently moved. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 18:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)