User talk:Sacramento52

Fake sources
You have twice now here and here introduced content into Wikipedia with citations that didn't support the content you added, and you originally introduced it cited to a kind of source that the community has defined as being unreliable per WP:RS. These two most recent edits violate WP:VERIFY, one of the key content policies here, and are also just dishonest scholarship that harm Wikipedia. Stop doing that. Jytdog (talk) 18:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The last source I cited was from The Center for Genetics and Society. In table 7 of the article in the link, National Policies on Human Genetic Modification, the IGM box is not checked http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=304. This indicates that there is no specific policy. I'm unclear how that is considered a fake source and violates key content policy. Sacramento52 (talk) 22:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * IGM = "inheritable genetic modification ("designer babies"); modification of the genes passed from one generation to the next". That is not the same Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; they are completely different things. You can do PGD solely to determine if the fertilized egg has a genetic disease or not - and PGD is used for that purpose for at-risk people - see here).  Jytdog (talk) 22:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, PGD and IGM are not the same thing. The article did not cite any notes on Mexican policy in relation to PGD, as it did to other countries. Thank you. Sacramento52 (talk) 00:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * that last source nailed it. hooray! Jytdog (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)