User talk:Sacredchao23

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Wormrot, makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Malconfort (talk) 02:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You are, in many ways, completely incorrect in your assessment of my edits.

For example: my use of the singular form of 'be' in the first sentence (Wormrot is a Singaporean grindcore band...) is correct, whereas your use of the plural (Wormrot are...) is not, especially considering that you then used the singular form within the same sentence (right after its founding members had...). Wormrot, the band, is a single entity, and should be referred to in the singular; it's members as a group of individuals are plural and should be referred to as such. Either way, the plural verb form and singular verb form should never be used in the same sentence to refer to the same noun.

Secondly, the entire paragraph about how Earache discovered Wormrot, was almost entirely pointless, rambling, and not-of-note (we, as readers, do not need to follow unquoted paraphrasing of Pearson's thought process), and so I, rightfully, reduced it to usable, useful information.

Furthermore, you removed my note about the release of Dirge in 2011, which, clearly is of note and should not have been removed.

While there may have been a few stylistic errors in my edits (for example, the use of the past-perfect tense (had) in that same first sentence may be preferable to my simple-past tense), they certainly were not as widespread as you seem to think.

I will be reverting these changes. --Sacredchao23 (talk) 11:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)