User talk:Saddam Hosaain Dipok

Welcome!
Hi Saddam Hosaain Dipok, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links you might find helpful:
 * How to edit a page
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * How to create your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia

Ask questions at the Teahouse or my talk. On talk pages, remember to sign your messages by typing a space then four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your message. That automatically inserts your user name and the date. Happy editing! Johnuniq (talk) 08:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Why remove my link Saddam Hosaain Dipok (talk) 08:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Saddam Hosaain Dipok (talk) 08:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to African-American literature because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 08:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Geoffrey Chaucer. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 08:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Geoffrey Chaucer, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Johnuniq (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Your recent editing history at Geoffrey Chaucer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Johnuniq (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)