User talk:Saddlerider3

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ed Hooper, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orlady (talk) 03:37, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ed Hooper, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

''It is not at all clear that the subject of this article is notable according to Wikipedia criteria at WP:BIO, including WP:AUTHOR. The templates that you removed were placed on the article to identify issues needing to be resolved. If you want the templates to go away, you can make them go away by adding references to reliable sources that support the information in the article (see WP:V), and most importantly by providing sourced article content that demonstrates Mr. Hooper's notability. ''

''If notability cannot be demonstrated, the article is likely to be proposed for deletion. '' Orlady (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)