User talk:Sadeera

April 2015
Hello, I'm Haminoon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gotabhaya Rajapaksa without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 08:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Mahinda Rajapaksa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 08:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mahinda Rajapaksa. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 08:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Maithripala Sirisena, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 08:35, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Maithripala Sirisena shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 10:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Maithripala Sirisena. ''You should also read WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Read the 3rd point. It specifically says "In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put numbers within the article in their proper context for a general reader. In cases where this may be necessary, such as in presenting polling information from an election or numbers of lost lives in a war, consider using tables to enhance the readability of lengthy data lists. Where it is not necessary, omit excess numbers altogether and summarize any necessary data concisely." No need to include which part has the most Tamils or Sinhalese. That's completely irrelevant to the subject. Chamith   (talk)''  21:29, 13 April 2015 (UTC)