User talk:Sadenar40000

Creation spree: minor-planet object articles
Hi Sadenar40000, mass creation of minor planet stub articles should be avoided (also see WP:NASTRO and WP:DWMP). Per my count, you've created the following articles in the last few days [update: revised articles in boldface]:


 * 1) (495603) 2015 AM281 (TNO)
 * 2) (501546) 2014 JJ80 (TNO)
 * 3) (501581) 2014 OB394 (TNO)
 * 4) (505448) 2013 SA100 (TNO)
 * 5) (505624) 2014 GU53 (TNO)
 * 6) (523674) 2013 MA12 (TNO)
 * 7) (523687) 2014 DF143 (TNO)
 * 8) (523683) 2014 CP23 (TNO)
 * 9) (523684) 2014 CQ23 (TNO)
 * 10) (523702) 2014 HW199 (TNO)
 * 11) (523706) 2014 HF200 (TNO)

Please stop creating new articles. This creates a huge backlog for others like me (fixing adding templates, categories, talkpages and the like). Instead, I ask you to start working on the ones you have already created. There are plenty of articles about trans-Neptunian objects that serve you as a template (I see you adopted some basic structure from them, which is good, but you also left out a lot of the basic components). I have revised the first article in the above list – which hopefully will serve you as a more complete "start"-level example. Currently, all articles are candidates to be tagged with if they are not expanded. R fassbind – talk  16:29, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Understood, sorry for the bother.Sadenar40000 (talk) 18:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I've currently worked on (523687) 2014 DF143, but I ran into some issues with the numbering and naming section, where I couldn't find how you got this: "numbered by the Minor Planet Center on 9 June 2017 and received the number 495603 in the minor planet catalog (M.P.C. 105261)." from the Archive. It must be somewhat obvious but I just couldn't find out, so I decided to leave the entire part out of the edit.Sadenar40000 (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Lastly, I don't quite get the spirit of the noticability guideline on minor planets/asteroids, it seems to say that even if those articles get enough work done on them, they would still be unnoticable, this is just my interpretation of it though Sadenar40000 (talk) 20:11, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Sadenar40000, typically articles are created when there is a study about the object (or anything that mentions it), so doing an extensive search on google is mandatory. Systematic creation of minor planet articles only referenced in databases should be avoided, which includes mass creation of articles based on red links found on the list of possible dwarf planets (historically, there were issues with mass creation of minor planet articles, creating a huge backlog; and the guidelines reflect the pain this has caused in the past). It's OK to find your own words and make your own descriptions from publications you found online about the object. Note: revised articles (above) are now listed in boldface to keep track of the current status.  R fassbind  – talk  12:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Understood, I'll fix the mess I've created and once that is done, redirect my time to more constructive articles, once again, sorry for the inconvenience caused. I initially started doing this because I saw quite a few TNOs articles and found it weird a lot of TNO articles in the french wiki didn't have their counterpart in the english one, now I know the reason for this and will refrain from adding more.Sadenar40000 (talk) 13:48, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear. No one said "mess"; the term I used was "backlog". It could have resulted in a "huge backlog" if all the redlinks on were turned into underdeveloped stub articles. That's why I posted early on, in order to prevent you from too much frustration. This is not the first time a warned wikipedians from creating too many/unsufficiently source articles. Unfortunately, people feel offended nevertheless, and in some way or the other, express their frustration and intention to move on towards other areas. That's why this post here was my last one that tries to alert others of potential article over-creation. From now on I'll just skip this part. I wish you all the best and, as you mentioned, good luck spending your time on more constructive articles.   R fassbind  – talk  00:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 10034-85-2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 10034-85-2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/10034-85-2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bas-Saint-Laurent, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Basque and Terre-Neuve ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bas-Saint-Laurent check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bas-Saint-Laurent?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Exchange
Right back at ya. I'm a native speaker of English and write for a living (I've written 10 good and 4 featured articles), so you help me with French; I'll gladly copyedit your translations for their English. Hit me up anytime.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aokas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Aokas check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Aokas?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bilia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rocca ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bilia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bilia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henri Philippe de Chauvelin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canon ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Henri_Philippe_de_Chauvelin check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Henri_Philippe_de_Chauvelin?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Bot
Hi. I have finished my bot run - petscan reports 0 cases left to fix. --DannyS712 (talk) 02:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Gabriel-Michel de Vassan
Please, can you create this page. More information are here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. Thank you very much. --80.116.56.68 07:03, 4 September 2019 (CEST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.116.56.68 (talk)
 * I see 80.116.56.68  is still going round the site asking for people to create pages for him/her. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Reactions to the 2021 Fall of Kabul - slated as Articles for Deletion
As you rated this article - alerting you in case you wish to join the discussion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reactions_to_the_2021_Fall_of_Kabul

Kaybeesquared (talk) 12:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2021 started
Hello, WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2021 has started. The India WikiProject has a backlog of around 10,000 unassessed articles, built up over the last few years. The time has come for comprehensive housekeeping and that's what this drive is all about. The drive will run from 1 September 2021 to 30 September 2021.

We request you to participate in the assessment drive. Learn more about the event here, learn assessment process and rewards details. Please add your name as a participant here.

Feel free to discuss this on the event talk page or at WikiProject India noticeboard.

You received this message, because you participated in earlier iteration of the assessment drive, or we felt that you may be interested to participate. --Titodutta (talk) 11:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for joining. I invited you as I found your edits here which are actually part of the drive. You may consider using Rater script, which makes rating a lot easier. Let me know if it helps or if you have question(s). --Titodutta (talk) 11:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Assessing military history articles
I see that you recently assessed two Military history articles, HMS Strenuous (1918) and HMS Sturdy (1919). The Wikiproject has a Manual of Style and guidance on assessment, including information on what makes a B-class article. I suggest having a look at these and then taking a look at the articles, particularly in light of the B-class criteria. If you have any questions, I have always found the lead coordinator Peacemaker67 and the rest of leadership team of the Wikiproject always extremely helpful. simongraham (talk) 03:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Assessment of Finnish I Corps (Continuation War)
Hi, and thanks for your assessment of Finnish I Corps (Continuation War). Would you be able to provide some more detailed feedback, preferably in terms of the MILHIST B-class criteria? I would have expected it to cover at least B1 and B3–5. –Ljleppan (talk) 13:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Taking a look at your contributions, it seems you took a total of 42 seconds to 1) find and 2) rate the article, based on the time from the previous rating to this rating. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, but I'm not sure how you could have made a meaningful assessment of the article state in that time? I see that others have already commented on your ratings in relation to MILHIST articles. –Ljleppan (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Project assessment
Hi, Sadenar40000, I've noticed from your long edit history that you primarily do assessments on article talk pages. I've started doing this within the past month or so and have added it on my user page as another project, probably the last thing to do on Wikipedia. Is there a project, a task force, or some group of editors that are involved with trying to clear this massive backlog? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
 * There is no existing overarching structure for assessment as far as I know, I only use the Unassessed Articles category to find what needs to be done. If any large initiatives arise they are often from specific WikiProjects working on their own backlogs like WikiProject India currently emptying their project's importance assessment backlog. Sadenar40000 (talk) 11:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

HMS Saint Eustatius
Hi, thanks for rating HMS Saint Eustatius. Could you expand on what's missing in referencing and coverage so that it might be improved? Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for asking questions, I'm of the opinion that while your 5 sources appear to be reputable and both sections of the article are correctly referenced, that their number being too low is mostly the issue here. The article itself is also somewhat short, even for an individual ship's article, which is why I felt it failed B1. If you feel like I've made a serious error and would like a second pair of eyes on it, feel free to submit it to requests for assessment on the WikiProject Military history/Assessment page.Sadenar40000 (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think you've made an error, the ship just didn't do anything else! It was a short-lived vessel which saw no recorded action in her time as a Royal Navy ship, and so there's simply nothing else to put nor many sources that discuss her. Difficult! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll reassess her as B then, if her service was that uneventful, apologies for the trouble. Sadenar40000 (talk) 22:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * No trouble at all, thanks very much for the swift reply. I promise not all my articles are as boring! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about Ryan Watson (politician)
just pointed out on my talk page that has been repeatedly declaring that Ryan Watson (politician) wasn't a redirect when it (semantically, if not technically) was. When I checked the page history, I saw that you'd rated it six times. I wanted to apologize for the unnecessary effort, and to let you know that if you ever come across a case where the bot incorrectly removes Redirect-class, you can let me know on my talk page and I'll try to fix it. Vahurzpu (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No issue, I don't even remember rating it, so it mustn't have been that inconvenient for me. Also your no ping template doesn't seem to work, I got pinged either way. :D Sadenar40000 (talk) 18:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-02
{| class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr" style="width:100%; margin:0; background:#DDDDDD; border:1px solid #BBBBBB; color:#000000; padding .4em;"
 * style="text-align:center;"| The winner this Translation of the week is
 * style="text-align:center;"| The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Pax airship disaster (pt:Catástrofe do dirigível Pax)

Please be bold and help translate this article!

Pax airship disaster was the explosion of the Pax airship on May 12, 1902, in Paris, which killed the Brazilian inventor Augusto Severo and the French mechanic Georges Saché.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 12:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-27
 The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Roller printing on textiles Please be bold and help translate this article!

Roller printing on fabrics is a textile printing process patented by Thomas Bell of Scotland in 1783 in an attempt to reduce the cost of the earlier copperplate printing. This method was used in Lancashire fabric mills to produce cotton dress fabrics from the 1790s, most often reproducing small monochrome patterns characterized by striped motifs and tiny dotted patterns called "machine grounds". Improvements in the technology resulted in more elaborate roller prints in bright, rich colours from the 1820s; Turkey red and chrome yellow were particularly popular.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-28
 The winner this Translation of the week is

simple:India naming dispute (ur:انڈیا نام کا تنازعہ) Please be bold and help translate this article!

The India naming dispute in 1947 refers to the argument over the use of the name India during and after the partition of British Raj, between the countries of Pakistan and the Republic of India. This dispute involved key figures such as Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of British Raj, and Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the leader of the Muslim League and a founder of Pakistan. By 1947, the British Raj was going to be divided into two new nation states – Hindustan and Pakistan. Jinnah was initially convinced that Hindustan would not use the term India, since it lacked indigenous pedigree, etymologically and historically India meant the Indus Valley (modern-Pakistan). He also opposed the use of the name India as it would cause confusion regarding history. The disagreement had significant implications for national identity and international recognition.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-29
 The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Adumu Please be bold and help translate this article!

Adumu, is a type of dance that the Maasai people of Kenya and Tanzania practice. Young Maasai warriors generally perform the energetic and acrobatic dance at ceremonial occasions including weddings, religious rites, and other significant cultural events. The Adumu dance is characterized by a sequence of jumps performed by the dancers, who stand in a circle and alternately jump while keeping their bodies as straight and upright as possible. In addition to wearing vividly colored shúkàs (clothes) and beaded jewelry, the dancers are typically clad in traditional Maasai costume. Traditional Maasai songs and chants are also performed during the dance.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-30
 The winner this Translation of the week is

en:Rathaus-Glockenspiel Please be bold and help translate this article!

The Rathaus-Glockenspiel is a large mechanical clock located in Marienplatz Square, in the heart of Munich, Germany. Famous for its life-size characters, the clock twice daily re-enacts scenes from Munich's history. First is the story of the marriage of Duke Wilhelm V to Renata of Lorraine in 1568, followed by the story of the Schäfflerstanz, also known as the coopers' dance.

(Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.)

About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)