User talk:Sadhakm

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah


A tag has been placed on Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 333-blue 08:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah


A tag has been placed on Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 00:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * - Thanks for your work on this article. I have removed the speedy deletion tag because it was placed by another editor contrary to policy. AusLondonder (talk) 03:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah (March 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sudhir_Memorial_Institute_Liluah Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:333-blue&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sudhir_Memorial_Institute_Liluah reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333-blue 13:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at KRChoksey Investment Managers Pvt ltd, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MER-C 11:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sai International School Bhubaneswar


A tag has been placed on Sai International School Bhubaneswar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Hitro  talk  12:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Booyahhayoob. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Booyahhayoob (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Sadhakm (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Actually I was trying to correct the redirection. As it was redirecting to wrong page
 * I saw. Just letting you know for next time. You had just blanked it first instead of replacing the redirect, which is why I posted this lol. Booyahhayoob (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bijoy Kumar Sahoo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bijoy Kumar Sahoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bijoy Kumar Sahoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Sadhakm (talk) I have given the source for each. He is well know person in Bhubaneshwar. He is being covered in news I am giving the link here https://www.telegraphindia.com/1160228/jsp/frontpage/story_71767.jsp http://www.dailypioneer.com/state-editions/bhubaneswar/cii-odisha-interacts-with-canada-envoy.html https://odishalive.tv/people/interviews/dr-bijoy-kumar-sahoo-president-cite-interview-digital-marketing/ http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/sai-international-school-launches-two-centres-of-excellence-109051600037_1.html http://www.orissalinks.com/orissagrowth/topics/district-all/district-cuttack/page/3

Nomination of Bijoy Kumar Sahoo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bijoy Kumar Sahoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bijoy Kumar Sahoo& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Deven R. Choksey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deven R. Choksey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deven R. Choksey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richard3120 (talk) 12:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah


The article Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources since Jan 2017, as noted notability and advert concerns since September 2019. Article reads more like an advert for information that could be found the Institue's own website. I do not believe that it also meet Notability. As no significant improvement to article propose deletion. Master Of Ninja (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Master Of Ninja (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sudhir Memorial Institute Liluah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Jayprakash Majumdar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jayprakash Majumdar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jayprakash Majumdar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Your addition to Nishant Choubey has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Nishant Choubey
Hello, Sadhakm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username The9Man and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nishant Choubey, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Nishant Choubey.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

The9Man &#124; (talk) 09:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajeev rai


A tag has been placed on Rajeev rai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Rajeev Rai. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DefenderBoy27 (talk) 12:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)