User talk:Sadiemg

Welcome to Wikipedia from Soviet King
Hi, Sadiemg. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put  (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. You also might want to consider being "adopted" by an experienced user, who can show you how Wikipedia works through a program called "Adopt-a-User". Again, welcome! Soviet King (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Letters to a Young Therapist


A tag has been placed on Letters to a Young Therapist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ben Ben (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sadiemg
Hello! It appears your article on the book "Letters to a Young Therapist" contains copyright violations (i.e. you copy and pasted text from another website?). That is not allowed on Wikipedia, for copyright reasons; the quickest solution to this problem is to delete the article. Also, before you start a new article, you should investigate fully the "notability" guidelines; in this case, the relevant guideline is: Notability (books). There are 5 criteria listed at the top of that page, and if the book doesn't satisfy any of them, then it is at risk of being deleted.

Those are just a few things to keep in mind for the future.. happy editing! Mlm42 (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The text does meet all notability requirements 1. text received a national award, 2. author is chair of a notable medical school, 3. the text is instructional for postgraduate professionals, 4. the text has been reviewed and discussed by notable figures in the field of medial psychiatry.


 * As for the copyright material, these references are public statement cited from the review section of amazon.com and from the publisher's website (Atropos Press). I will reference the publisher's website to improve this issue. Thank you for your suggestions.


 * While those points you raise may be true, by themselves they are not enough to meet the notability requirements. Indeed, it appears that somebody else has already deleted the article. I'm not doubting that this book is good and useful.. but of the five criteria listed at the top of Notability (books), I think the only one it is close to satisfying is "The book has won a major literary award." The word "major" hear is somewhat subjective, so the case would need to be made that the award it won qualifies as a "major" award.


 * Anyway, I think the main reason your article was deleted was because it was written more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article (see What Wikipedia is not). So hopefully you keep these things in mind for your future edits; it's always disheartening when your work is lost.. but the best way to prevent that, is to ensure your edits conform to Wikipedia's practices. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. :-) Mlm42 (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Soviet King
Thank you for this, I will have to approach this listing with these suggestions in mind.
 * Hey no worries, If you want help, I'll try with my bestest of ability on Wikipedia to help you. Just contact me on my talk page or an experienced editor/admin if you want help. Soviet King (talk) 03:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

One more thing
This might be a coincidence, but you seem to be editing the same articles as, , and. If any of these accounts are yours, I need to ask you to please only use one account. Please see the policy Sock puppetry. But thanks again for your contributions; hopefully there will be many more in the future! :-) Mlm42 (talk) 01:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vincenzo Di Nicola concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vincenzo Di Nicola, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 07:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)