User talk:Sadr.physics

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saeid Ebrahimisadr (June 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saeid Ebrahimisadr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saeid Ebrahimisadr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Saeid_Ebrahimisadr Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gusfriend&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Saeid_Ebrahimisadr reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Some advice relating to the draft article you have created
I see that you have posted a conflict of interest notice on your user page, so presumably you know about conflict if interest guideline. However, there are still a couple of matters related to the draft you have created which I think you should know about.

Nothing in what you have written suggests that you satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and if you don't then no article about you is likely to be suitable for Wikipedia, no matter how it may be written. There are, in my opinion, too many of these guidelines, and most of them are unnecessarily long and complicated, making them confusing for new editors. However, the central point, as described in the general notability guideline is that for a topic to be considered suitable to be the subject of a Wikipedia article, it should have had substantial coverage in multiple reliable published sources independent of the subject. The requirement for independence means, for example, that nothing written by yourself, or published by any institution where you work or have worked, contributes to establishing notability. The requirement for reliable sources means that there is no value to be attached to material published on any website where users are free to post more or less what they like. I haven't seen anything suggesting that you satisfy the notability guidelines. My impression is that you probably don't, but if in fact there are suitable sources, then they need to be cited in any article about you.

I see that most, perhaps all, of what you wrote in the draft has previously been published on LinkedIn and Research Gate. Probably you wrote it yourself, and you own the copyright. However, Wikipedia policy on copyright is quite strict, and goes further than the legal requirements. Basically, we do not accept material previously published elsewhere unless we have proof that the copyright owner has released the material for free re-use in accordance with Wikipedia's licensing terms. If you post anything to Wikipedia, you are indicating that anyone at all is free to re-use it, for any purpose at all, either as it is or modified in any way. It may be that you own the copyright and are happy to license the material under such broad free terms, but Wikipedia policy is that we don't assume that without clear evidence. Somewhere there's a page giving information about how to provide evidence of release of copyright to Wikipedia, but I can't find it now. However, it probably wouldn't be worth following up anyway, because the draft is written more like a personal CV or résumé than like an independent account by an uninvolved outsider, and therefore wouldn't be suitable as a Wikipedia article without substantial rewriting. JBW (talk) 08:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Saeid Ebrahimisadr
Hello, Sadr.physics. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saeid Ebrahimisadr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC)