User talk:Sadsadi51

Welcome!
Hello, Djitpedia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Daffodil Japan IT, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Daffodil Japan IT


A tag has been placed on Draft:Daffodil Japan IT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:44, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The account Mahadi51 appears to have been created just before you made this unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I need to ask, did you create the Mahadi51 account? It seems like a remarkable coincidence for it to have been created shortly before you requested it as a change of username. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that the user hasn't made an account in the English language Wikipedia, so there's no violation. PhilKnight (talk) 22:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation, and it's not a problem. As PhilKnight says, you haven't done anything wrong as you have not used the new account to edit here. You seem to understand the issues now, and if you're willing to follow Wikipedia's conflict of interest polices (described at WP:COI), I'd be happy to welcome you back to editing. The only real question is whether you'd prefer to use the new Mahadi51 account or have this one unblocked and renamed to sadsadi51? Let me know. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)