User talk:Saee Patil

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 07:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Saee Patil, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oracle Corporation, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Oracle Corporation was changed by Saee Patil (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913493 on 2018-09-09T07:59:42+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: In my opinion the bot (ClueBot NG) was correct in reverting but gave a harsher level or warning in this particular case than was necessary.Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Addition of unsourced content
Hello Saee Patil, thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia articles. However, please make sure to provide reliable published sources for the added information. Ideally all Wikipedia content should be verifiable by independent reliable sources (see links for more info). Some sources that are usually not sufficient and should not be used are: personal knowledge and analysis, other Wikipedia article or Wikis, blogs, forums, most promotional content, most information from non-experts, among others. Reliable sources such as reputed news media, expert books and journals from established publishers should be added directly behind each verifiable statement or paragraph - WP:Referencing for beginners contains a detailed "how to" guide. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask or post for advice at WP:Teahouse, a forum for new editors. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 09:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Saee Patil. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Oracle Corporation, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. There are some indicators there is a some chance you may have an conflict of interest (COI) with Oracle or Oracle PartnerNetwork. This is simply a gentle reminder to declare an interest if that is the case as you may be unaware of that need. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pencak Silat, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. It appears despite warnings above you have continued to add content without adequate sourcing/references to a number of articles with varying degrees of disruption which a number of people have felt the need to review and revert. It is particularly necessary to avoid degrading the quality of sourcing of existing articles and to avoid disupting existing citations. Particular care must be given to altering the lede(lead section). Can you please take care to review the advice above. Can you also not mark edits as minor unless they are typos etc, see WP:MINOR. Thankyou Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Tractor Case IH1455XL March 2018.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Tractor Case IH1455XL March 2018.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 07:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:ElddisAvanté 860.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:ElddisAvanté 860.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 10:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Editing problems
As well as the problems mentioned above, there have been other problems with your editing, including the following.
 * 1) It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. I( have found a number of places where you have certainly posted text that you have copied from elsewhere, and other places where it seems probable that you have done so.
 * 2) Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view, and must not express personal judgments or opinions.
 * 3) Wikipedia is not a medium for publishing reviews, even if they are written from scratch, which the ones you posted weren't. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)