User talk:Saf 1

Appeal
I'd rather he appealed here, but he is appealing to me over MSN Messenger. He is my friend, but as I have told him I am primarily and foremost serving the encyclopaedia. I am currently reviewing the evidence and will report back soon. asenine t/c\r (fc: f2abr04) 23:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * If he wants to appeal, he needs to post an unblock request here. Having said that, a history of sockpuppets used to repeatedly recreate an article just for the purposes of vandalism really is going to be hard to come back from. Thanks, Gwernol 23:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * He is not a sock (or at least he says not, and he has not lied before), that article is listed at Encyclopaedia Dramatica to be recreated. asenine t/c\r (fc: f2abr04) 23:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the update. So, "all" he has to explain is why he decided it was a good idea to repeatedly recreate that article on instruction from Encyclopdia Dramatica, after being warned not to, particularly given the contents he was creating... Gwernol 23:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Apparently he is appealing as we speak. I do actually agree with you though, even if I am his friend. asenine t/c\r (fc: f2abr04) 23:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am Saf, and I created the article because I believe something with a magnitude of the Mitchell Henderson case deserves to have an article here. I see no reason why it cannot exist here.