User talk:Safakerener

Hi Safakerener, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

First I need to say, if an article is written about a book, it should not be a book summary. An article about a book is about how the book has a place in the world, where it is situated in the world, etc. Only a small part is about the contents of the book itself, summarised, the rest is about the era, circumstances, usage, etc of the book in society.

Please try at first to bring in some structure to you article by adding headers. The look for literature about the book, as well as literature about those things that give context to the book (both before and after the publication). Greetings - Romaine (talk) 11:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: seems okay, partly, I am not sure what you mean with "in Evolution".
 * Links: missing! In Wikipedia articles we link keywords to other articles in the same Wikipedia. For example these can use a link: Samuel Butler, Theory of Evolution, Charles Darwin, etc. Please go through your article and add links to other Wikipedia articles.
 * Headers: missing! Headings are needed to give structure to an article, but also to increase the readability of an article. In you article I would like to see the headers Context, Contents, Reception and References, but also others are welcome if relevant.
 * References: inline references are missing! Every paragraph and every two/three sentences should have an inline reference. You can use a reference more than once. Without inline references an article can't be published.
 * Context/timeframe: missing! In this section I expect to read about what has led to the existence of the book and the timeframe in what the book was written.
 * How was the book received: missing! In this section I expect to read about how the book was received, what people thought of it, how it was used, what influence it had and how it influenced they way people thought, how the perspective of the book is different from modern views, etc.