User talk:SafePilot1246

"Research and skin complexion proves otherwise"??? I know an Iyer with a pitch black complexion. At the same time, non-Brahmins like Jayanthi Natarajan, etc., are as fair as most Tamil Brahmins.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 04:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * These are exceptional cases and they don't prove anything. Racial admixture of two closely residing groups is inevitable, but the level of mixture here has been kept under control to a large extent due to strict caste segregation laws of yesteryears. - Gene Ash 09:37, 08 September 2009 (IST)


 * The first link is about Iyers of Madurai (not even the Cauvery Delta) and Madurai is not the only place where Iyers live. And then as per the sources I've used in the article there is also enough evidence showing similarities withe rest of the Tamil populace. If you wanna spread racist hatred and facism on basis of skin colour all right go ahead. But you can never claim an intellectual basis of all this nonsense for it doesn't exist.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service  14:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * - The Enforcer Office of the secret service 09:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * While, one particular research has found similarities between Madurai Iyers and the people of Central Asia, another has found similarities between Iyers and Bengali Brahmins. I do not know much about Bengali Brahmins but Bengalis, in general, have Mongoloid characteristics, than Indo-Aryan. As far as the physical anthopology is concerned, let me produce the results of a study made by Edgar Thurston at the turn of the last century.


 * From the Iyer article, you might observe that Iyers have an average cephalic index of 74.2 which doesn't differ much from those of people from other communities. So, you might observe that Iyers are mesocephalic like other Tamils and lack dolicocephalic skulls associated with the Aryans.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 14:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Gangadhara Vajapeyi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gangadhara Vajapeyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gangadhara Vajapeyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahesh Raghvan (November 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Mahesh Raghvan may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Geneash Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kpgjhpjm&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Geneash reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kpg jhp  jm  06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mahesh Raghvan


A tag has been placed on Draft:Mahesh Raghvan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.maheshraghvan.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kpg jhp  jm  06:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)