User talk:SafetyPat

Welcome!
Hello, SafetyPat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Richard Malott does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nthep (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Malott and JRC
The practices of the JRC are possible a notable subject but the whole issue belongs in an article on the JRC and not the article on Malott. I'm aware his a director of the JRC but unless there is direct criticism of him you must steer clear of coatracking the article into another subject. If there is specific mention of him in any of the proceedings or commentary about JRC then that is sutable material for the article on him but it must be limited to the specifics of his involvement, not discussion of the whole issue. I'm also a little concerned about the use of your own blog as a source. If the blog is all reliably sourced then quote those sources not the blog and I'd also advise you to read the conflict of interest policy and the neutrality policy as it appears you may have a particular viewpoint to take on this person and the JRC. Nthep (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)