User talk:SaffronBacchus

Bitcoin
Are you affiliated with the website you added to bitcoin in any way? AlbinoFerret

Yep! I'm Saffron Bacchus! :)
 * Your edit in that case is a conflict of interest. You would need to divulge that on the talk page of the article and have agreement of the active editors to include the website. AlbinoFerret  03:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

-BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE- Comment: Signed by Bitcoin Armory v0.92.3

Hello AlbinoFerret! :) -BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-

HCw1cBJBCarPJGxSJua+H4dUQZpVYRC5UZSD+bLBEHLcmwORqqQ4/YcsJsRR5yJo +yBZ4t4G4b37R7J+fnqRFJM= =FWhO -END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, SaffronBacchus, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type on your talk page here, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Wuerzele (talk) 02:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bitcoin. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. ''Wikipedia has notability requirements, and primary sources are inadequate in that context. Thank you'' ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 10:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Sorry, I've never used Wikipedia like this before! Someone sent me an email saying that the Bitcoin wiki had added the launch of my membership site to the "Merchant Acceptance" section, which I thought was really cool! A little while later I checked back and it said that it had been removed for lack of notability and bad source, so I re-added it using the most accurate source (my website). If it helps, here's a more legit source, an article about my site by XBiz (a prominent industry news source) http://www.xbiz.com/news/189518. I hope that counts as notable! :)

I'm really sorry, I really have no idea what I'm doing when it comes to Wikipedia, I just tried to re-add my blurb following the same format as the original poster. I wasn't aware of any sort of approval process or anything. I'm not even clear on how this "talk" page works for messaging! :P

Please let me know if this helps clarify things! :)SaffronBacchus (talk) 16:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)