User talk:Safiasouthey

In response to your feedback
Click the "my contributions" tab at the top of page to find your contributions.

Charles (talk) 21:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Adeena Karasick
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Adeena Karasick, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.prairiefire.ca/interview_jhc_karasick.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:11, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, yeah, it's partially from somewhere, but I cited it, and I have permission from Adeena Karasick herself (who pretty much wrote that blurb). Is that okay? Safiasouthey (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC) user/safiasouthey


 * I'm afraid it's not. I'm going to leave you some information below about this issue. I have also left detailed comments at Talk:Adeena Karasick about the removal of the copyright text (and why) and about the current state of the article, including issues of notability, referencing, and unencyclopedic promotional tone. Voceditenore (talk) 14:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Avoiding copyright problems
Hello, and welcome. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to visit me at my talk page. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 14:07, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Adeena Karasick
Hi, thanks for your contributions to the article Adeena Karasick. However, before you add any more references or external links I think you should read the reliable sources and External links guidelines. Some of the links in that article (I'm not sure how many of them you added) don't comply with wikipedia policy on reliable sources. This is particularly important in an article about a living person. In general links to blogs are not reliable. Also be careful when linking to Youtube as there could be copyright problems with the videos. It is also important that references are relevant to the content of the article, and with inline citations relevant with the surrounding text. Thanks and goodluck with your future edits. Sarahj2107 (talk) 01:32, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Karasick
Hi. I've been asked to take a look at this article. Basically it reads like jacket notes or a publisher's promotional blurb about  one of its authors. It's practically a résumé (CV) and contains no biographical information. A true academic will understand what an encyclopedia is and will not need to exploit Wikipedia for additional publicity. Having 'permission' to write about someone only demonstrates that  there is a Conflict of Interest which is clearly manifest through the style of this article. The fact that the text of the article is partly a close parphrasing of text  'pretty much  written'  by the subject  herself, is sufficient  for me to consider possibly deleting  the entire article. I am  sure that  there is a place for Karasick  in  our encyclopedia, but  the style of the article needs to  be greatly  toned down, and the addition of biographical background is required. I hope this helps. If you  have any questions or need help understanding  our policies, please don't  hesitate to  contact me or Voceditenore.

Please note also that registered users are required to log in each time they  contribute to  an article or discussion. This will avoid editing privileges being blocked for all users connecting from that IP address.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Adeena Karasick.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Adeena Karasick.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)