User talk:Safiel/Archive 2

Talk: Pro Fund Real Estate
I've tried to make a page for the San Diego Coastal properties but it go ta speedy deletion. My recent article on Pro Fund Real Estate did not try to promote itself, but rather define what objectives were currently present for people searching the San Diego Coast for real estate. With the new wave of online databasing the internet community is prominent in it's search for information in whatever way they can get it. I was hoping that one of these ways would be wikipedia. Please let me know what changes need to be made in order to comply with regulations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by San Diego Coast (talk • contribs) 16:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Ranma ½
I've undone most of the changes you made to Talk:Ranma ½ as it broke many of the infoboxes on the page. The only thing I kept out of your edits was the use of WikiProjectBannerShell to make the 4 WikiProject banners take up less space. —Farix (t &#124; c) 13:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

I have posted a topic on Monosuit and it has been deleted due to no references in text form. But this is the issue i am facing, as it is hard to find exact definition in text form but it is good enough in Picture format. So, at least we can use the text in wikipedia to narrate the picture and it will be useful for other people who want to know about monosuit type. I think editors in wikipedia will understand this and help me in this regard.

Note: Many articles are narrated using pictures, please give me a solution for this. --Alpen129 (talk) 07:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Fred Prigge
Hello Safiel. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fred Prigge, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  19:36, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

1saleaday
I don't see how you can say that this article is written more like an advertisement compared to many others about other retailers. G11 clearly states: Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion. If you would kindly remove your tag it will be greatly appreciated. As far as the COI, that is quite the stretch and I wonder what that is based on. Thanks for your concern and contribution with the categories. Mordechai10 (talk) 19:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Do not Block me
Do not you see in the discussion said that was emailed to the IOC President to be friends? -- PM734 (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I broke 3RR and retagged it - it's vandalism, and it's persistent, so I think I was justified. Still, I appreciate the extra pair of eyes on it, thanks. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Safiel (talk) 21:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ghanaian high school diplomas
Hello Safiel. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ghanaian high school diplomas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: How is that a hoax? Thank you. Ged UK  14:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of New England prep schools for deletion
The article List of New England prep schools is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of New England prep schools (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orlady (talk) 18:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Of Twentens
About twentens. First of all it is a nick name for the 2010s, and thousands of people use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaip2014 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Re
Erm... I moved the page from Terry Ananny - Canadian Artist to Terry Ananny (artist) and tagged the original for R3. I believe you're looking for this talkpage. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 19:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries, it's happened before. We all do that with some frequency; I accidentally warned an admin about removing speedy tags once. Not a problem. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 19:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Suzanne Massie
Hello Safiel. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Suzanne Massie, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Victrectomy
You are completely correct. I agree fully. Either delete it fully, or maybe merge parts of it with the existing article Vitrectomy. And maybe you know how to make sure that there are no requests with slight typing mistakes on portal medicine. I did not notice that Victrectomy was demanded, instead of Vitrectomy. I wondered why Vitrectomy was missing, and created a small article, but it was a typing mistake. Dara Koper — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dara Koper (talk • contribs) 05:41, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

POPC
I have removed your speedy delete tag - the context was obvious from the brief article. PamD (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline for Deletion of Rhed Martin
Hi Safiel, I decline your message to delete Rhed Martin in Wikipedia, Indeed, all the content about him in wikipedia are accurately true.

He won as First Runner Up in Mr. South East Asia last December 3 - 5, 2010.

With the events following details:

Host Country - Indonesia /Batam Host Committee - Sky Entertainment Festival Date - 3rd/4Th/5Th December 2010

Festival Producer - International World Pageants Festival Chairman - Mr. Sunny Oii

Malaysia Licence Holder - YinZi Yoga Center Singapore Licence Holder - In Queenz Philippines Licence Holder - Artistudio Indonesia Licence Holder - Sky Entertainment

Also this is for the event in South East Asia called "South East Asian Festival of Beauty and Friendship 2010"

The reference in this article are reliable. Thank you.

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

MisSiss
I know the article still has flaws. My primary language is not English, so that makes it hard for me to write in it. I am gathering information to add it to the article, that is why I marked it as a stub.

MisSiss created (a new genre that until then) was never released in the world. This genre is Soul Tango the mix between the Tango music from Buenos Aires, Argentina and the format and way to sing of Soul singers. She composed all her songs and performed with the most important musicians from Buenos Aires like the main Violin of Astor Piazzola for example. There were more than one article in USA media talking about this and the interesting sound of it. In Austria that there were not many releases today she is a reference for many independent artists for her way to teach and sing with another groups like Soulistics where she is the founder or Gospel & More where each year calls thousands of people to listen to music on the streets.

I'm working to improve the article but i need more than 7 days.

Gragry (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Moving comment that was originally left on my user page
I am trying to get some people to help with the page, give me some time please, thank you. Kamek98 (talk) 03:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome email but why do you keep deleting my references then saying my articles for two movies I worked on have to be deleted because they have no references? What's the point? And why do you think this is a hoax? If it's a hoax, I don't see why anyone would do it to try to be funny.

Aren't references good enough when they're coming from 1) the press release and 2) the official Facebook page of one of the actors who is a well known comedian from Video On Trial who has their own Wikipedia page?

What's up, Safiel? CaptainBlastCaptainblast (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Pardon me for butting in, but Facebook and press releases are not reliable sources for referencing. See WP:RS. Peridon (talk) 20:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Achille
I've declined it - there are claims there and I feel AfD is the place for it as they are unreferenced. Peridon (talk) 20:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Kate Middleton/Archive 2


A tag has been placed on Talk:Kate Middleton/Archive 2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6-House Keeping - Parent talk page was moved to new title of subject

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 16:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Kate Middleton/Archive 1


A tag has been placed on Talk:Kate Middleton/Archive 1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6-House Keeping - Parent talk page was moved to new title of subject

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Please review
I requested speedy deletion on article Incrasebux. Could you review it for deletion please? I am not an administrator, so I cannot delete. Shakinglord (talk) 20:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Hi Safiel. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Pen Fight, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Catfish Jim &#38; the soapdish  15:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Safiel. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for K.C.Veeramani., a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Catfish Jim &#38; the soapdish  08:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Flintstones (Fox Television series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Flintstones (Fox Television series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Flintstones (Fox Television series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C T J F 8 3 16:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject tags
Hi Safiel, just to let you know that you don't need to add unused parameters to wikiproject tags when you add them to talkpages. Particularly with the WPMILHIST tag, if you add "=no" to the tag then it actually breaks the template. If you have any questions, please leave them on my talkpage. Thanks, Woody (talk) 13:48, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Florida Brewing Company
Greetings! You voted delete in the above-referenced AfD, of which I am actually the nominator. Another participant in the discussion found a decent source for the article that subsequently enabled me to find some additional sourcing of my own. Regardless, I had a go at revising the article to incorporate the additional sourcing, clarify its focus on the building itself, and excise the promotional material that you rightly objected to. I'm curious to see if the revised version changes your AfD opinion; I'm considering withdrawing my nomination. Best, ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb 04:08, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rex Addison


The article Rex Addison has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * BLP with no significant claim to significant Notability and very weak referencing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 12:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Anthony Weiner photo scandal/Archive 1


A tag has been placed on Talk:Anthony Weiner photo scandal/Archive 1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6: Moved talk archive to correspond with move of parent talk page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 19:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

fyi

 * Hi. You may wish to take another look at Articles for deletion/Nikos Tatasopoulos (2nd nomination), as the discussion has -- among other things -- revealed a COI that reflects upon the independence of the sourcing.  Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for giving it a second look.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

C.R.Kennedy & Company Pty Ltd
Permission was given for the text via OTRS. I'd encourage you to work with the other user that edited the page, in order to collaboratively improve the quality of the article. :) Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * C.R.Kennedy & Company Pty Ltd

Speedy deletion nomination of Manzanilla, Trinidad and Tobago


A tag has been placed on Manzanilla, Trinidad and Tobago, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6 - Refer to talk page for rationale

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 04:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Casey Anthony
I noticed that you closed the Casey Anthony article RFC as "consensus no article create". There seemed to be significantly more support for the support of the article than the not, so I'm wondering why this was done (at least why it was done in this manner). At least from a standpoint of numbers of editors, the issue would either be "consensus to support article create" or "no-consensus" (probably "no consensus"). Of course, these aren't votes, and I haven't gotten to policy arguments yet, but the manner of labeling the closing seems odd, to say the least.

I understand that if you made this decision you are supporting the policy arguments made by the opposition to the article. I am not attempting to engage in that argument again (you can see my position clearly on the archived discussion). This message is merely about the manner of the closure.

Also, what would be the next step seeing as it looks like about 75% of the respondents to the RFC wanted an article based on existing WP policies?LedRush (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you an admin? Do you have authority to close that discussion and archive it?  As it seems that you've done this and indicated a consensus which I feel clearly doesn't exist (seeing as only about 25% of respondents agreed with not having an article) would you mind reverting and letting an admin make the decision (assuming you're not an admin).LedRush (talk) 20:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Interesting BLP1E argument
I see in your comment here that you think that Anthony would get her own article if she confessed. That seems interesting to me. On the Murder of Merredith Kercher (MoMK) article people have often argued that Amanda Knox doesn't deserve her own article, but they would support one if she were found innocent in the appeals. Can I ask why you would think being innocent would make it less likely to get your own article (and not more likely, as I've been led to believe by others)?

Also, why would BLP concerns (or BLP1E concerns) be more for an innocent person being profiled in a "Murder of" article rather than a separate article. It would seem better per BLP not to have a person redirected to a murder article when they are found innocent of the crime.LedRush (talk) 18:31, 27 July 2011 (UTC)