User talk:Safiel/Archive 5

Jared Lee Loughner archiving change
I've raised a potential issue with your edits here. Did your archiving bot parameter modification force the bot to archive an RfC awaiting a close? Viriditas (talk) 09:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Samuel B. Cooper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Dies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Paul M. Warner
I did not write this article, and so needed no notice about it. If you look at the history, you'll see that it was a userspace draft written by User:Eustress. I'll notify him momentarily. FYI. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * No worries - it seems to have worked itself out. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Removal of list of magistrate judges in PR
I request you take a look at my comment about your edit. Thanks. Pr4ever (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Judge Richard M. Berman
I believe that Judge Berman did move to senior status last year, per this announcement. (See top entry in right-hand column.) Has there been a subsequent announcement or correction that I might be unaware of? Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of judges of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Richard Sullivan


 * United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Richard Sullivan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gleeson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Nelson Stephen Román
Just a heads up that Nelson Stephen Román already had an article at Nelson S. Roman. I tagged both pages for merger. Billyboy01 (talk) 05:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the merge. Appreciate all the work you're putting in. Billyboy01 (talk) 14:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William S. Greenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rutgers University School of Law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matthew hussey


A tag has been placed on Matthew hussey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

R3 - Unneed redirect as a result of a capitalization error

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/King Felix
Why did you close this AFD when the article still exists? - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It was deleted and the previous valid redirect reinstated: . Jarkeld (talk) 23:57, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Mike Crapo
I didn't disagree w/ this reversion but that claim is just (as far as I can tell) being added to the lede. It's substantiated in the body (news reports + a statement from the senator's office). Just FYI. Thanks for keeping an eye on BLPs! Protonk (talk) 04:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm a bit new to the process, I thought such a fact would be properly placed in the lede, and was cited in the body so I don't see why the reversion was made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.137.178 (talk) 06:46, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually, didn't realize that it was in the lead, but it was. I probably could have let it stand, but to be on the safe side I reverted it. Also, placing it in the lead might have constituted a violation of WP:UNDUE. In any event, looks like they have reached a good balance in the article now. Safiel (talk) 18:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Please help Expand Esteban Escobar aka Steven Escobar Wikipedia article
Safiel,

Please help expand Esteban Escobar aka Steven Escobar Wikipedia. He is an Award Winning and Humanitarian that give back to the community. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WorldWideVital (talk • contribs) 23:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Levinson
Hello Safiel. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Levinson, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: AfD discussion resulted in the deletion of article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Poundland
Hi. I saw you delisted Poundland as a GA here, noting that the neutrality issues had not been addressed. But I feel did address them, and I said so in the reassessment. No one replied to acknowledge the changes, but they also did not come up with any problems after my changes were made, so I am not sure why it was delisted as a GA. --Odie5533 (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Guo Bao Rou
An article that you have been involved in editing, Guo Bao Rou, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rincewind42 (talk) 03:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Printex Ghana
Hello. I declined the csd as asserts significance. Thanks Dloh cierekim  22:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Benois v. West's Dept. Stores, Inc.
You were quite right to be hesitant about using G3 blatant hoax, but I have decided to speedy-delete it anyway, because in the 99% chance that it is a hoax, we don't want it spreading all over the internet via mirrors for a week, and in the 1% chance that it's true, it comes under the instruction in WP:BLP that unsourced contentious material about living persons "should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". I have told the article author that I will restore it if he produces reliable sources. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, WMS: The Social Balance, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 02:57, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Lighthouse Library/ECCRC
You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

The Secret of the Fortune Wookiee
Hey. I know the article sucks, but the creator was very new and may be a kid considering the subject matter. Next time please at least Google something before assuming bad faith and marking it as vandalism. Steven Walling • talk   02:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Shawn Achor
I think you may have gone overboard here. Based on its own documentation, the Multiple Issues tag should be used to list the most important issues, and is not to be used as a "badge of shame". I feel you on this -- the article in question feels highly promotional -- but better to address the most grievous issues first. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Tau (Sculpture)
Yes - please delete the duplicate article. I was following directions from a tutorial, but I thought that I was working on a draft in my sandbox, not creating an actual page. In fact, please delete Tau (sculpture) as well, because that information is inaccurate and it will be better presented on the page that I am currently working on in my sandbox. It is also possible that I inadvertenty created a page entitled something like LauraHolzman/Tau (AP). If that is the case, please delete that as well. LauraHolzman (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

The Settlers of Warcraft‎ not eligible for speedy deletion
I agree that The Settlers of Warcraft‎ should be deleted. However, it's not a web game, so the article is not eligible for deletion under CSD A7. —C.Fred (talk) 02:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: HiRECA
Hello Safiel. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of HiRECA, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article—HiRECA. Thank you. — Theopolisme ( talk )  03:37, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Lift Deletion Comments on Yap Kwong Weng
Dear Safiel, I hope to have accurately represented Mr Yap on his achievements and background. I think he is a wonderful and notable individual that deserves to be mentioned on Wikipedia. I am sure that other Singaporeans probably think so. Therefore, I hope that you will pardon my ignorance on Wikipedia as I tried to put in as much information yesterday without realizing that it was not permitted. It was my first time using Wikipedia and do not wish to affect Mr Yap in anyway. I know better now. : ) Thank you very much for understanding, and hope you can allow the deletion format to be lifted for these reasons. Augustine Koh 14:50, 30 March 2013 (UTC) Augustine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Augustine koh24 (talk • contribs)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yap Kwong Weng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pointer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Check your user page
Hi Safiel,

I don't know if you noticed, but someone left a message on your user page. Just thought I'd let you know :)

Gold   Standard  18:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

La Bonche
Hi Safiel, I am a struggling new user who has found my article falling at the first hurdle... I cannot un do the deletion as I cannot find appropriate button -nor can I edit article to add further notices. do you think I should change the name of the article to Five Ring Circus aka La Bonche ? Perhaps you can advise and help be get around the objection. I do think that it is important that real communities can be represented here and that the validity can be seen to be proven in other forms than academic articles. Regards Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madame La Bonche (talk • contribs) 13:07, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vernon S. Broderick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks and there may be another couple
Hello S. Thanks for adding the speedy deletion nominations to the two articles about the TV series that I AFD'd today. I have made mistakes with speedy in the past which is why I go the more laborious AFD route. Would you please take a look at this Articles for deletion/Tears of a Tiger (film) and see it they are also eligible for a speedy. If not no worries we will let them go through the whole process. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 15:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks like another editor has taken care of things. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 15:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Pamela L. Reeves (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Thomas W. Phillips


 * United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Thomas W. Phillips

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Sri Srinivasan
Please ensure you include a WP:RS when adding information, especially about a WP:BLP. GiantSnowman 20:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Don't bite the newcomers
If you come across another article with only a "Under construction" message, please redirect the article to user space. Otherwise, you risk biting newcomers. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 00:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Afradapis article
Hi Safiel, We have finished our project for the mock wiki article on the primate species Afradapis longicristatus. I'm currently swamped with finals and although it is not required for my assignment to upload the article to Wikipedia...why not. We put the work into it, might as well help everyone else with it. Anyways, I have never made a wiki page. Only minor edits. We created a word document to turn in, was wondering if I could send you or someone who just loves doing the coding and whatnot to make it live. 9 pages of content with many pictures. Everything is cited like a normal paper (Author, year).

Any idea how we can go about this? I'm so intimidated by the plain text editing page. -Tom

Tbw875 (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Renee Petropoulos
Do not remove CSD's from articles and give no reason. I'd suggest you not remove any CSD's as you don't know CSD policy. Bgwhite (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I am WELL aware of CSD policy. If you had bothered to check, you would have seen that the CSD tag applied was CSD-A3, no content. There was PLENTY of content on the page when I removed that tag and it was a valid removal. And Wikipedia policy is quite clear, if CSD reasoning no longer applies, the article is no longer a candidate for Speedy Deletion. So please don't tell me that I don't know CSD policy. I have APPLIED CSD tags many times here, properly, with the articles in many cases ultimately ending up deleted. And on several occasions, I have REMOVED CSD tags, without anybody complaining. So again, I know what I am doing, I took the action I did for a valid reason and I will continue to apply and remove CSD tags, always within Wikipedia policy, just as I did at Renee Petropoulos. Safiel (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2013 (UTC)


 * You are missing my point "no longer applies" means nothing. You need to tell why it no longer applies, especially when A3 also doesn't mean "no content" as there can be content on the page and still be deleted by A3. Read up on what CSD-A3 means.  I read what is on your talk page and your past history of applying CSD and it does show you have a higher rate than normal for errors.  Bgwhite (talk) 18:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Andrea R. Wood update
Thanks for the updated info in the Andrea R. Wood article. We need an updated source also. (See my edit comment there.) Thanks. —Telpardec TALK  00:06, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Royal styles precedent
Precedent is precedent, not certainty. Until we have a satisfactorily authoritative source for the child's style, we cannot include one. DBD 22:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=578185239 your edit] to Emily C. Hewitt may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amy Blankson
If you have time, could you recommend improvements to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amy Blankson and/or comment on the notability of the topic? You can add an afc comment template below the existing one(s) to give your feedback. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:10, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Olympus PEN E-PM1
Back in January 2012 you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested on its talk page, so per WP:DEL I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lemony lark
Hello Safiel. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lemony lark, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''sorry, but it is an essential part of A11 that the subject was invented by "the article's creator or someone they know personally", and there is no evidence of that here. Let the PROD take care of it.''' Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 23:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, apologies - your evidence on the PROD2 shows this is indeed a valid A11, deleted as such. Sorry about that, but people are being rather too enthusiastic about using A11 for any WP:NFT subject. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Admittedly, the copyright notice was not really prominent and could easily be missed on cursory examination. Safiel (talk) 17:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

One more for deletion
Thank you for fixing Irfan Ametov deletion box. Can you also name Artem Konovalov for deletion. He last played in Estonian leagues 2008 and Slavic names without the father's (middle) name are as good as John Smith 194.150.65.91 (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Found his middle name Юрійович. He last played for FC Bucha in Regional championships of Ukraine (football) Ukrainian football competitions for amateurs. 194.150.65.91 (talk) 00:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to List of Research Centers in Morocco
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the List of Research Centers in Morocco article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks, I just was confused between PROD and Deletion. PROD you can delete, I checked (however I am not sure). Its quite confusing. Thanks for not blocking me!--Mishae (talk) 05:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The Big Five Pageants' Ranks


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Big Five Pageants' Ranks. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of major beauty pageant winners by country. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of major beauty pageant winners by country – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Safiel (talk) 06:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

New Section
New Section added to the discussion of kiwi gardner. I am right and the article will not be deleted once it gets the approval from a REAL wikipedia administrator A.K.A not you. Please read and apologize — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathgenious989 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Disruptive Editing?
Cant i remove speedy deletion tags? It said i could remove it so i did. (Mathgenious989 (talk) 00:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC))
 * You may remove a speedy deletion tag if it no longer applies, but only if you did not create the page. You may not remove the tag if it is on a page you created. Hope this helps. - Josh3580 talk/hist 08:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Concerning the Speedy Deletes
Hi, I put the speedy delete tags on the following pages, Sushuang, Behemosaurus, Pyrokerberus, and Antillodaeodon because I was contacted by the copyright holder of those subjects, who just found out that they were on Wikipedia, and wishes to have the pages, together with Arbaxoceras, deleted as soon as possible, as they are a part of an as of yet unpublished project of his, and the pages were made without his permission.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I have reverted, however, you may want to post that on the administrators notice board and they will take appropriate action. I reverted the speedy's as they did not state a valid criterion. Safiel (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I have, thank you for the explanation. I hope this situation gets resolved as soon as possible.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything proprietary on any of the pages and they should all be likely gone in a week under Articles for Deletion. Safiel (talk) 17:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

K. Sedghi
Hi. I made this article myself and I want to delete it. What's the problem? I've researched for one year among the iranian pilots. I'm from one of the families of these pilots. Such a person (K. Sedghi) doesn't exist. Diako1971 (talk) 08:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I restored the redirect that existed until a few days ago. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  08:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Since I have created this article myself, can I request for deletion?Diako1971 (talk) 13:07, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The reason I removed the PROD tag was that the article had already went through the Articles for Deletion process. Once it has gone to AfD, PROD can no longer be used. Safiel (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I have added a link to this discussion on Talk:K. Sedghi. If you want the page removed, wait a few weeks to see if it is turned back into an article then nominated it for deletion at either WP:RFD if it is still a redirect or WP:AFD if it is has been turned back into an article.  However, the burden of proof will be on you that any references in any revision of this page that mention this person are either not "reliable sources" and/or that they are inaccurate.  Your personal research in this area is considered original research and it won't hold much sway in a deletion discussion.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  18:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced comment from user page
I have red your pro-deletion comment to my article about Mundo (the hun). It was not meaned as a hoax. Looking myself for further information on Mundo I have registered yesterday by night that there exists only the simple word in Wikipedia, but nothing more, so I decided to share the few details I know by reading here and there. I`m relatively new in the internet, so I can make technically mistakes. I`m a foreigner and English isn`t my mother tongue, so my grammar may be awful. But be it as it be, everyone can correct my mistakes. So I sat there and wrote last night and saved my writings, to make a pause for some necessary refreshments. And when I got in again, my unfinished writings had been smashed out by Mister administrator. I`m of the opinion that a writer should have the right to finish his work and then the critics could come and like or destroy his elaborate. Is it always the case, that you were stopped in between when formulating an article at Wikipedia??? I thought always to get something done, a disputatio with thesis and antithesis is far more usefull than a wild standby discussion. I have some problems, because a lot of my reference books are not in English or old editions, so giving a page-number may not be helpful. On the other hand a chapter in Eugippius for example has mostly five to twenty lines, so the administrator must have find the words if he had taken himself some time. I had a lot more informations about the mundos. Plural, because there were at minimum three of them in the history books. Grandfather, father and son and they all had together an important role in the fights for Italy between the different powers (Scires, Goths, Gepids, Byzantines, Langobards). So the elder Mundo helped the side of Theoderic, but his son and grandson got payed by the other party and helped Constantinople to destroy the Gothic kingdom just like the Langobard and Gepids Narses had rented, too. The Mundos: Their men were called indeed scaramuzes in different bowdlerizes and they owned realy a fortress called Hertha at the Morawa estuary, as you can read also in serious books of reknown academics. Many people have listened to the french Opera-Scaramouche of the baroque aera and never asked from where does this figure come. Others know from the comedia dell`arte from Northern Italy, from Lombardia, the Bergamo region. The Scaramuzzo is used also in the puppet theatre there and he is an old folklore figure since the early middle-age and then before rented soldiers were called Scaramuzzo, a langobardic word (!!!), not a word from italian or vulgary latin.

And if you now have read from those not very nice fellows here and there as by Rodenberg or Wolfram acting in the Danube region in the peoples migration time, things began to add in your brain. So, I let it here as it may be. With best wishes, Volant Federlin. 16:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Kermit Gosnell
Thanks - I am a new user. I would suggest that you read the complete offensive section before claiming that i am trying to censor something here.

The next sections below which would really mean that the offensive images are not encouraged until really needed.

However, this does not mean that Wikipedia should include material simply because it is offensive, nor does it mean that offensive content is exempted from regular inclusion guidelines. Material that could be considered vulgar, obscene or offensive should not be included unless it is treated in an encyclopedic manner. Offensive material should be used only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available.

Please refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GFFENSE#.22Not_censored.22_does_not_give_special_favor_to_offensive_content 16:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Kiwi Gardner AfD
I think you took the right action in withdrawing the AfD nomination as you obviously couldn't have been aware of the NPR piece when you nominated. I was confused, however, by the mention of a possible later nomination "...if this guy's career does not pan out." I have often been directed to the not temporary guideline in AfD discussions. If you agree that the guy has established (at least minor) notability now, wouldn't his article be more deserving of treatment of such failed-promise players such as William Gates? Granted, Gates was the subject of an extremely notable documentary which makes his notability solidly-established separate from actual basketball accomplishments according to WP:NHOOPS. That said, If RS coverage says Gardner is notable now, his later career can then be covered whether he succeeds or fails, don't you agree? Thanks. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Comment
Hi Safiel,

Thanks you for feedback. I would like to have some clarifications on the same. A hospital is not a commercial entity. A company page is meant to have details about the company itself and cannot be viewed as a "unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person". This term is acceptable for any other company but i am not sure for a hospital. Wikipedia in general is not a marketing tool but it can be used to provide information about a particular company.Kindly help me to differentiate the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeniferFernando (talk • contribs) 06:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Barclays edit-a-thon listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Barclays edit-a-thon. Since you had some involvement with the Barclays edit-a-thon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Safiel (talk) 21:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Kev Adams for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kev Adams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kev Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 02:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kev Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NT1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for changing the type of deltion
On one of them I marked as no content or something as when it was there it was just something like "A essay about" when you came in it said something bout a book so yeah thanks for the update there, nice to see someone updating the tag. Wgolf (talk) 03:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Aban ibn Said, Abid ibn Hunay, Abid ibn Hamal
If somebody fluent in arabic could translate the arabic version of the pages into english, then maybe there would be enough information to put on the english pages.عمر چودھری 08:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omar Choudhry (talk • contribs)

Your AFD closure of Baader-Meinhof phenomenon
Hi Safiel

I have just closed the discussion on the RFC you opened at [], following your non-admin closure of Articles for deletion/Baader-Meinhof phenomenon (3rd nomination).

AFAICS, the "keep" result of that discussion is not reflected in the substance of the discussion, where no RSs were identified. If they had been, the RFC would not have been stymied by their absence.

Nor do I see that the closure meets any of the WP:NACD grounds for non-admin closure. It was a very early WP:SNOW closure (only 16 hours after discussion opened), of a debate about a topic which had been overwhelmingly deleted at the previous AFD, and where no evidence had been offered to counter the complaint of lack of sources.

Please will you reopen the discussion? -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I will go ahead and open a fourth AfD, given the extended period, over a month, of which the third AfD has been closed. I had closed that AfD, as it seemed to be an inappropriate vehicle for what the nominator wished to accomplish, which was more on the lines of a move/merge. Safiel (talk) 23:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sharan Estone


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Sharan Estone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)