User talk:Sagarjagnade

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You gave no in-text references. There was a dump of bare urls at the end, but they were not in-line so we can't tell what fact each is supporting. They appeared to be linked to your company anyway.
 * There is no evidence of notability such as staff and student numbers or funding. Most of your article is about Yashaswi Group rather than the IMMS
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. Your article is littered with multiple spamlinks to your company and its courses.
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: '' flagship group... well known for its placement services, education, engagement, employment of the rural poor and under privileged... extends the spread of the concept of "Learn Earn"... well in alignment... striving to provide... much-needed... beneficiaries

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Your looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 * If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting this topic. Paid editing is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization, directly or indirectly, to edit Wikipedia. It is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the company you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.