User talk:Sage1217

You may want to read up on use of reliable sources before editing here again, to avoid reverts such as the recent ones on the article regarding Goran Visnjic. Wikipedia lays out specific policies for sourcing, and sources must be both reliable and verifiable. A Croatian language article from a tabloid is neither; I couldn't read it and verify the facts, so I challenged the edit, as I had the right to do. It was then up to you to do as you finally did with the Croatian Times (which is still iffy, but seems to have fact-checked.) You have to recognize that the average reader won't know that the Visjic's allegedly prefer Story, and it's not relevant. Anything that goes in the article has to be sourced, and explanations go on the talk page, not in an edit summary (but thank you for using one!) Sourcing is based in what is accurate, reliable, fact-checked and verifiable. That's why media like blogs, tabloids and websites are rarely, if ever, considered to be reliable. As you edit more, you'll get the hang of it, but you'll find most editors are very firm about expecting reliable sources. Drmargi (talk) 17:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)