User talk:SageGreenRider/Archives/2016/March

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Broadcom (disambiguation)


The article Broadcom (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Per WP:TWODABS, disambiguation is appropriately dealt with by hatnotes in the articles. A move request claiming otherwise did not gain consensus.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 19:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Broadcom (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broadcom (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Broadcom (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 17:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Broadcom (disambiguation). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 00:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * The discussion was in the edit history which references clause 6 of MOS:DABSEEALSO Talk to SageGreenRider 00:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colin Wynter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TED. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Actually I was wrong..

 * No, you were right, . The person who vandalised has a set of vandalism-only multi-sock accounts created specifically with a usernames confusingly similar to mine. The vandal has User:SageCreamRider and User:SageGreenRiderGhost maybe more. Seems to target folks who have contributed to the Donald Trump article. User:Protectprowrestling has a similar MO. There's some similarity to IPs Special:Contributions/68.94.30.5 and Special:Contributions/68.32.124.174 Should receive an immediate permanent block IMHO. Cheers. Talk to SageGreenRider 14:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah thanks for the info. Optakeover  (U)(T)(C) 16:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem. BTW I filed a sock investigation WP:Sockpuppet investigations/SageGreenRiderGhost on them.‎ Talk to SageGreenRider 17:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

SageGreenRiderGhost
Hey, it's me. I just want to let you know that I won't attempt to edit your user page again. SageCreamRider is also under my control. I went to the Donald Trump article and chose a random person. :) However, protectprowrestling, IP 68.94.30.5 and IP 68.32.124.174 are not mine. (That last edit was me not logged in by accident and was my IP, lol.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SageGreenRiderGhost (talk • contribs) 17:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)