User talk:Sagemaster69

graphology is a science and has been used in court for over one hundred years. your using science all over the definition of graphology, why would this be considered unscientific.? there is no definition that claims other then a scientific category. check any other source and you'll see graphology is a science used in courts, only science is used in courts...understand? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagemaster69 (talk • contribs)
 * Hello, I have a quick question first. Graphology doesn't look like it's used in courts, but questioned document examination is. Are you sure you are not talking about the other one ?
 * Now about your change itself. From the article, you can check that we have 6 independent sources stating that graphology is a pseudo-science. The validity section is clear and well sourced on the fact that graphology has no predictive value. Whether we agree with this or not is irrelevant. On Wikipedia, we follow what the sources tell us, please see this page. --McSly (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2011 (UT)

Answer, graphology IS used in courts where YOU see it is not the issue. science is truth and fact. there is more scientific proof the anything else on this definition. there are over 12 complete defination at to training, usage, and hard core evidance of the work surrounding graphology, if this is not science then Wikipedia is a pseudo-encyclopedia. the word analysis is scientific by definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analysis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnBDLoqXrDc&feature=related this analysis was made before i was born, please redefine graphology as scientific

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Graphology with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Alex discussion ★ 21:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC) stop fighting me on this subject, graphology is science, all of the definition used in courts proved it. every thing in this definiation points towards science, even in supreme court. this is science and cant be listed as anything else. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/graphology http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/science there is nothing to discredit this science. http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7305496n&tag=mncol%3Blst%3B1


 * Sagemaster69, clearly you have something to add to Graphology that you feel strongly about. However, repeatedly reverting other people's reverts is not how we do things on Wikipedia. Please read WP:EDITWARRING and WP:CIVIL. Since you disagree with the editors who reverted your edit, the next thing to do is discuss it on the talk page. The other editors, no less than you, care about getting the facts correct, and have put a lot of work into researching verifiable sources. If you have information from verifiable sources that's not already covered in the article, there must be some way to incorporate it. —Ben Kovitz (talk) 04:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

here is my argument, the word analysis is scientific i refer to Wikipedia itself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analysis

October 2011
Sagemaster69, I see that you just tried to revert the revert again, and in regard to this edit, falsifying a source has no place on Wikipedia. If you want to contribute here, please take some time to read some of our policies and guidelines. WP:V might be a good place to start (a game show is not a reliable source), as well as WP:PRIMER. Bottom line, we do collaborative editing here. If you have a disagreement with other editors, you must work it out with them, and not get into an edit war. —Ben Kovitz (talk) 14:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC) graphology used in court, oct. 5, 2011, people vs conrad murray stated as scientific during court room testimony. verifiable handwriting was submitted to the court as evidence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science