User talk:Sagnick007

Welcome!
Hello, Sagnick007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 14:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Disclose old accounts
Hi, can you please explain/declare your association with this account. The name seems similar and there is a general overlap of interest. You also started editing soon after that account stopped. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 15:45, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Indian locomotive class WAG-11 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Indian locomotive class WAG-11, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in List of active Indian military aircraft, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Follow the style guide from WP:AVLIST for aircraft lists. —Gazoth (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks!--Jklamo (talk) 08:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Project Unigauge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bisalpur ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Project_Unigauge check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Project_Unigauge?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

List of active Indian military aircraft
Hello, I'm Sarvatra. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of active Indian military aircraft, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 13:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey, can you provide me any source for 20 tejas mk1a aircraft currently active? I reverted your edits cuz I didn't find about 20. There are confirmed sources of 16 active. And about 83 mk2, there are yet to recieve order. Brown Chocolate (talk) 04:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I don't understand why you said I reverted your edits cuz I didn't find about 20. I never claimed 20 mk1 tejas currently active. It's Sagnick007 who keeps adding that information without any source again and again. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 06:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Apologises, I am extremely sorry. It was a mistake. Thanks for understanding. Brown Chocolate (talk) 07:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, so it was for Sagnick007. Just a little correction: 40 confirmed orders are for Mk1 (not Mk1a), and the 83 additional aircraft which may/will be ordered in future are of Mk1A variant (not Mk2). Thanks. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 20:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I too got a confirmed source that 83 more mk1a aircraft are finalized but are yet too sign ( Maybe will be sign in weeks or two). Old order of 40 mk1 will not be affected. Cheers Brown Chocolate (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, can you provide me any source for 20 tejas mk1a aircraft currently active? I reverted your edits cuz I didn't find about 20. There are confirmed sources of 16 active. And about 83 mk2, there are yet to recieve order. Brown Chocolate (talk) 07:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Brown Chocolate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of active Indian Navy ships, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Brown Chocolate (talk) 16:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of active Indian military aircraft, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Brown Chocolate (talk) 09:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of active Indian military aircraft. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 05:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of active Indian military aircraft. The source for 83 Tejas Mk1A only says the HAL will receive orders. It hasn't happened yet, thus goes against the consensus of article's talk page. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 06:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

List of active Indian Navy ships
Just wanted to let you know, that there already is an article Weapon systems of the Indian Navy. So your addition of content on List of active Indian Navy ships in the "Weapons" section may be more suitable for that page. Thanks. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 09:27, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Indian locomotive class WAG-11


Hello, Sagnick007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Indian locomotive class WAG-11.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of equipment of the Indian Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Floating bridge ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_equipment_of_the_Indian_Army check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_equipment_of_the_Indian_Army?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Arihant-class submarine does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 15:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)