User talk:Sagregory

December 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Make-up Art Cosmetics. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 132 20:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Make-up Art Cosmetics. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Forums, chats, blogs, Facebook, fan sites, are NOT reliable sources and they cannot be used to cite anything, let alone controversial information. 132 23:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Please make some sort of attempt to discuss this instead of edit warring to get it in. I'm very willing to help you out in this, but just pushing your version, without proper sources, is going to do nothing but be seen as disruptive. --132 23:07, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

SInce this is a cultural "movement" it is very difficult to find references to it outside of forums, chats, and the like. This dosen't make it any less relevant or interesting to the reader. From what I can see on the current page, apparently only the company's own website can be referenced.


 * It is preferred that the company's own website not be used as a source, but there is no rule that says it can't (it's called a primary source). Forums, blogs, chats, etc however are considered unreliable in almost all circumstances and can't be used to source information, no matter how relevant or "interesting" you may think it is to the reader, especially when it comes to controversial information. To read more about the kinds of sources that can be used, please see WP:RS. Thanks. --132 04:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)