User talk:Sahand57

"Israeli-Occupied Territories" Vs. "Occupied Palestinian Territories"
It is necessary to distinguish between the two terms in order to avoid disputes between the interested editor-parties. As a rule of thumb I propose that we use mainstream and credible sources when writing about either term or even broadly writing about the Israel-Palestine conflict (For example, we should use credible sources such as ICJ rulings, U.N. documentations, and mainstream human rights reports in place of personal, Israeli, or Palestinian claims). Also, we should refrain from editing sections unless: 1)There are no citations and no verifiable statements. 2)If there are suspect citations, then we should write a dispute with alternative credible sources with citation before editing.

Warning
I didn't want to use a "vandalism" template, but your actions in Israeli-occupied territories can be considered vandalism. You're trying to hijack that article for some POV cause. That articles discusses all territories Israel captured, both what's considered Palestinian, and others - the Golan, Lebanese territory, the Sinai peninsula. The West Bank and the Gaza Strip are discussed under the section "The West Bank and the Gaza Strip" of that article, where they are called the "Palestinian territories" - see that article, which seems to be what you mean. okedem (talk) 22:10, 26 December 2009 (UTC)