User talk:Saharkhan91

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia; and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 21:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

I've done the rename (from User:Suvdrive) and someone else will review the unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

You say you don't want to promote your company, but that's what you've been doing. In the two edits you made, you added links to your company's web site. Are you aware that it is a kind of promotion? Are you aware that it's not allowed? Do you intend to continue adding such links if unblocked?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

To the reviewing admin, note this user engaged in block evasion using, earlier today. --Yamla (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC) In fact, it's worse than that. The edits were made to continue spamming links to his/her website, despite this claim. --Yamla (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)