User talk:Sahebzadah

September 2018
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Durrani Empire, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you.  ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  19:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Being a direct descendant means we know more than many
I do not find your neutral perspective when writing about my direct forefather.

We have all the legal rights to challenge the material and sue the defamation in the name of being neutral. Reference doesnt mean the truth is being portrayed many of those references link does not even exist.

Sahebzadah (talk) 18:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please state now that you have no intention of taking any legal action or suggesting to others that they do
Or you will be blocked until you withdraw the threat. See WP:NLT. Doug Weller talk 18:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

I do not have intention, however you have no right to undo what i write about my family as i said those references do not cite the opinion expressed as those are not facts and its maligning our family name.

Its common sense how can millions of people of those tribe can be referred as Durranis? As opposed to their heirs..?
 * If what you're claiming about "your family" is true, then you should be able to provide reliable sources to support your edit. On wikipedia, we go by what reliable sources state, not by what editors (even those being "personally" involved in an article) think or say. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  18:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Firstly on what basis u are allowing the existing references which do not even exist. What kind of reference do you need to talk about your family. The onus is upon the conflicting party which is you not me.
 * See WP:VER. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  18:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has existing policies and guidelines regarding editing with a conflict of interest, assuming good faith from others, citing and identifying reliable sources, and not engaging in original research. You are generally failing to follow those policies. Are you interested in adhering to them or not? Ian.thomson (talk) 18:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Durrani, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

ALIZAI
What relation does it have with Durrani? Why do this tribe be promoted specifically and be named as Durrani.

Therefore i removed it. As i said many references are extinct and it has no bearance to what was being written. In fact they are not neutral

It had no sources .. That link to alizai page has no validity .. ??

Wikipedia does not care about what editors think they know, it cares about sources
See WP:VERIFY. Whatever knowledge you may have isn't useful here, it must be from sources meeting the criteria at WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 18:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

None of ur revertion towards my page stands any validty. The page of DEONI is mine. Dont think you can just click a button and undo my many spent hours on it. I referred a legal document and writ number for that content which u removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahebzadah (talk • contribs)
 * No, the page on the Deoni is not yours, it is Wikipedia's. See WP:OWN.  You do not own anything here. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:39, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

I have asked many questions which seems not answered at your end. You are demonstrating biasism

Libelous BLP Violation
Why didnt u ever undo what i did for deoni page before? My edit was more references and structured..

Your act is basically blp violation.


 * I have no idea what you mean. You added material about the "Durrani brothers"that was not in the source. Doug Weller  talk 18:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You have edited with a conflict of interest (leading you to claim you own one of our articles), refused to provide sources, refused to understand clear messages, and said you agreed to the site's principles and then immediately went against them (while insisting that you do not need to cite sources).
 * Then you keep implying legal threats after more or less indicating you understand you're not supposed to do that. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)