User talk:Sahil0303

The group in general did a good job in explaining smFRET as in the previous article only Methodology and About sections were filled in but I believe following can be improved in future draft versions- The introduction is just a line in previous version and this one, It would be better to elaborate on smFRET, briefly its methods, advantages, uses, etc to give an overview of everything coming ahead. There are a lot of typos in the topic name itself some times they refer to it as Single FRET sometimes as SmFRET, Make sure to use just one acronym smFRET and be consistent with it. They do not provide any historical background for the smFRET technique. They talk about "FRET histograms" it would be better to show some pictures of the same. Also pictures do lack in general too. The present picture quality is not good either with x and y labels blurred. A picture of chromophores - acceptor and donor explaining FRET would be helpful. They talk about methods, advantages and application too much and not at all about instrument and history. " labeled tetrameric KirBac potassium channels were labeled with " - there is no pic to support the labels. What is ligand pip2? The example seems directly copied from a article and is not translated to simple english for non-experts. Too many jargons and acronyms still prevail. They have cited mostly technical papers and not made any effort to site non-journal sources. All the contents seemed linked to their respective wikipedia pages

Whatever the content is on the page is okay as per in terms of content only. They even not have proof read their article before. It is too technical and no attempt is made to bring it down to non-expert level. Only 1 figure that too of poor quality. No non technical references included. It needs to add a good application of smFRET or drastically improve its present application explanation.

Sahil0303 (talk) 17:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)