User talk:Sai Krishna Kanakala

Hi sai krishna Pls add the content of Amaravati page in history section instead of primary section and I move the content to suitable and right place in page and also pls change back the infobox images to good view and add your images in history section only which it suites at your recently edited content to exact spot and follow according to wikipedia's policies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4070:205:8BA8:0:0:20D5:20AD (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kakinada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coringa ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kakinada check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kakinada?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Indic script
- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Rajahmundry, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:50, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Placenames
Please stop changing the names of places in articles to different spellings to those used as our article titles, as you did at Rajahmundry. We use the WP:COMMONNAME in English for our articles, not the "official" names, so changing the spelling breaks wikilinks to those articles and is confusing to our readers - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:50, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Population
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Rajahmundry. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

March 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajahmundry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. You were clearly asked to stop changing the names of places in articles to different spellings to those used as our article titles, above - Arjayay (talk) 10:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vijayawada, you may be blocked from editing. You were clearly asked not to add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, above - Arjayay (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajahmundry. - Arjayay (talk) 15:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kurnool, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kakinada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beach Park ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kakinada check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kakinada?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vijayawada, you may be blocked from editing. ''Stop adding unnecessary wikilinks and redundant mention of Vijayawada being the second largest city. It is already mentioned in the lead.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Vijayawada, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". '' this edit is absolutely NOT a minor edit. Please be more cautious when selecting that option.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 20:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". ''You've continued to do this - it's deceptive, disruptive and at this point, just dumb. Stop it.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vijayawada. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 20:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kakinada. - Arjayay (talk) 10:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amaravati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Remains ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Amaravati check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Amaravati?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Andhra Pradesh. - Arjayay (talk) 18:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Andhra Pradesh
Hello, I'm DonSpencer1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add too many citations and over-link words in the lead of the article. Thank you. Don Spencer talk-to-me ⛅ 20:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You restored content that violates our policies on reliable sources, original research, and over-citing, please review the edit summaries before restoring content. Discuss any content issues on the talk page. Don Spencer talk-to-me ⛅ 21:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andhra Pradesh. If you continue to unnecessarily bold parts of the lead, add non-neutral language (e.g. "known for their long hair, tall stature, sweet language and mighty prowess"), and, generally, disregarding other edits' comments. Please work with your fellow editors to improve the article. Don Spencer talk-to-me ⛅ 21:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Andhra Pradesh‎. SovalValtos (talk) 14:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for unresponsive editing, edit warring, disruptively ignoring other users' concerns after a block for the same behavior, refusing to discuss changes on the talk page of articles. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

When you make your next request, just click "edit" instead of "new section" which creates unnecessary section headers. Place your request in the larger edit window and not the smaller edit summary/section header box. If you are using a phone, you may find it easier to use the desktop version of Wikipedia in a browser, which will have full functionality. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.