User talk:Sai Raghavendra Puranam/Archive 12

a warning for what?
you sent me a warning and reverted my changes for Baadshah and Pokiri,previously. I'm seriously wondering if you are some sort of troll as i cannot see any reason why you would see me adding information is somehow vandalism.

I wonder how i report YOU for vandalism. We're here on Wiki to share information and if you're against that,feel free to leave but don't stop others from contributing.108.244.138.234 (talk) 22:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.244.138.234 (talk) 22:49, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

1 (2013 film) poster
Raghu, i reverted the poster back to the version i have uploaded. I don't see how the poster you have uploaded is better than the one that was there before. Atleast give a valid reason why the old one was not good enough, otherwise it is just owning the article/file and claiming other editor's work not adequate. krZna (talk) 23:02, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not sure how me being a good editor matters and is relevant in you reverting something without any reason. This is not how things should work Raghu. I don't care about the poster that's being used, the thing that bothers me is when you are reverting my edits, don't do it because you want to. I have reverted your edit back, i would suggest you refrain from such acts further. krZna (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * What? I hope at-least you make sense of what you just wrote Raghu. I have uploaded the new version of the movie poster that accurately identifies the film and the article itself. As you might have known, the previous version was re-sized image of a widescreen poster. What you did is basically revert my edit because it's some how aesthetically not pleasing to your eyes or you somehow assume that you own the content page. You have been here for good amount of time to understand that you don't own any article or content on Wiki. You have been doing good work here, continue that and refrain from reverting because you can. krZna (talk) 15:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh,that makes complete sense Raghu, you are so the bigger man to settle the dispute. I forgot that arguing with you is such fun and time well spent. krZna (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of R. P. Patnaik for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. P. Patnaik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/R. P. Patnaik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I've begun some cleanup and sourcing, but additional assistance from someone with your skills would be appreciated.  SCHMIDT,  Michael Q. 08:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)