User talk:Sai Raghavendra Puranam/Archive 5

Happy New Year 2013
Wish you a very Happy New Year 2013. Torreslfchero (talk) 10:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

From Sridhar Pillai
Hi Srikanth, Thanks for letting me know the information about the sources. But i believe my edit is reliable because i followed the link tweeted by baadshah writer gopi mohan. Hope you respect my first post.

EEGA Gross Collections
Hi Raghu sri, I can understand what you said. Could you pls provide any citation/ wiki guideline that what could be present in the Infobox so that I can follow the same guideline. Regarding the Box office fig, If TOI is a reliable website I would like to remove the box office figures as it did not reach 100 cr mark as per TOI. It really creates unnecessary confusion if it is seen as 125 cr in the Infobox. I really appreciate if you do this. Thanks (HariharBrahma (talk) 02:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC))

Widescreen Posters
Hey Raghu, i've observed that you are uploading new versions to the files that are of widescreen nature. Can you please explain what is your intention behind this act. Thank you.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Fine. Thanks for the reply. Wish u n ur family a happy Sankranthi in advance.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Belated New Year wishes and Advanced Happy Sankranthi :)
Thank you for the strawbwerries and barnstar and best wishes for you.Conversation with you has been fun :)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviteja338 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks and wish you the same Raghu. Have a nice day :). Thanks, krZna (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Rahgu, any issue with the SVSC poster? I have seen that you uploaded 7 to 8 files in a single day. Let me know if there is anything i can help with. Thanks, krZna (talk) 07:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * It might be a glitch Raghu. But in my opinion stick with one poster that clearly portrays the actors and the movie logo. You don't need to take the trouble and upload latest posters each and every time they release. Only if you think the current poster is not serving its purpose, then you can update it. And about the glitch, i am not sure what i can do. If you want, i can try uploading a new poster to it and see if that helps. Although not recommended, you can upload a new poster and tag the existing one with CSD F5 to try if that glitch is resolved. Thanks, krZna (talk) 23:27, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

SVSC
I want to avoid another edit war. So here is my thoughts on the box office section. I think it would benefit the article if that is made into a new section. Most films articles on Wiki do differentiate between release, reception and box office. I have also divided the box-office section to two subsections (India and Overseas), this is in anticipation of the content that would be added in future. My plan is to wait for few days and if the content is not there, then we can merge those two sections. Just let me know your thoughts on this. Happy Sankranti Raghu. Thanks, krZna (talk) 06:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
DRAGON BOOSTER   ★  11:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

svsc unconstructive edit????
Could you clearly tell me... I cited the telugucinema for overseas.. which is one line... I did n't get what made you comment like this ... (HariharBrahma (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)) " There is no particular list of reliable websites, but usually anything from a newspapers like The Times of India, The Hindu, Deccan chronicle and so on would be considered an ideal link. Specifically for Telugu films, popular webpages such as idlebrain.com, 123telugu.com, rediff, sify, telugucinema.com, Indiaglitz might be preferred." one of your wiki friends told. (HariharBrahma (talk) 01:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC))

Isnt It....?
Dear Raghu, Dont you think that the poster you uploaded for Seethamma Vakitlo Sirimalle Chettu lacks clarity a bit..? if you find my arguments baseless, ignore it. if not, please try to upload a poster of better quality. Thank you.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

svsc : reliable citations
Pls see the below post from Krishna about reliable websites.... It seems it varying from person to person.. Which sites do you think are the reliable ones..??????

"There is no particular list of reliable websites, but usually anything from a newspapers like The Times of India, The Hindu, Deccan chronicle and so on would be considered an ideal link. Specifically for Telugu films, popular webpages such as idlebrain.com, 123telugu.com, rediff, sify, telugucinema.com, Indiaglitz might be preferred. If you know that something is true and you cannot find a proper reference among the above said websites, then you can opt for other alternatives. There are so many websites about Telugu news that are not so accurate, especially about the box office numbers. So, just make sure the website is popular and reliable before considering it as a source. For example, Gulte.com or Thupaki.com are not considered reliable for obvious reasons. Please let me know if you have any further queries. Hope you have a great time here and happy editing." krZna (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

(HariharBrahma (talk) 01:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC))

Reliable websites
Hello Raghu, You can not restrict users from edit the wikipedia content. On what basis can you confirm that one website is unreliable. Be the new user or old user, you have to tell the other users why you considered it as unreliable source. If you are not a new user and you feel like experienced user, you should let the other users know by having a post in you talk page regarding the websites you consider unreliable and reasons. Don't feel like wiki page is your personal content and it is a public content so you have to justify the reason for every act/edit you do. List out the reliable and reliable sites you feel for telugu cinema. You are supposed to do this. Help the users or stay away from restricting the users.

Bare Urls: How could you allow the bare urls in the svsc content. Earlier you deleted some content as it cited with bare url in one of the pages.. (HariharBrahma (talk) 12:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC))

Proposed deletion of Aagadu


The article Aagadu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
 * Planned film which has not yet commenced filming and is only tentatively titled: does not meet notability conditions for incomplete films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 14:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Aagadu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aagadu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aagadu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the wishes. :) krZna (talk) 23:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)