User talk:Saianurag

Actually leave it. "Developing Countries' Debt" is a better topic than "Economic Inequities". - Shirin--Shirin tejani (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Why have you changed your selection after I approved it? Please revert back. - Shirin --Shirin tejani (talk) 04:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Article selection ok. - Shirin (09 August 2011)

hello Saianurag (talk) 17:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)


 * } Gsinghglakes (talk) 06:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Gentle Reminder - Wikipedia Assignments
Hi,

Good to know that you have created your userid on wikipedia.

However, would like to remind that you are missing on following deadlines for 3 of your subjects decided by your teachers.
 * Timelines - History of Economic Thought


 * Timelines - Indian Banking and Financial Systems


 * Timelines - Agribusiness and Marketing

Please reach out to any of your campus ambassadors for any queries you might have.

Regards, Gsinghglakes (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

KUDOS
Hey Saianurag! Here have a cupcake for your awesome edits. Keep up the good work. For any problems, you can refer to me or any of the other Campus Ambassadors. Happy editing.

Debastein1 (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Loan waiver
Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Loan waiver--The content seems well-organized. However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article does not have any relevant Wikilinks, and so doesn't follow Wikipedia style guidelines. It would be great if you could also help improve the related article E-Loan. Jipinghe (talk) 20:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I just  saw this article It  seems to  me that  this article is a complete assembly  of phrases and sentences from  multiple sources. Perhaps you  could check out  our policy  on   WP:COPYVIO. Thanks for your help. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Saianurag. Kudpung asked me to look at this. Your article was basically OK. The phrases were pretty common and none of them long. I fixed it in the one or two places where it might have exceeded that. It was also a little disorganized so I fixed that too and formatted the citations. It's important to give the full bibliographic information about the sources. You can see what I did with the citations by comparing your version and mine. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 13:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)