User talk:Saikano

Block reason: See user's contributions. I managed to convince him that Wikipedia is not a social networking website but even so he seems completely unable to contribute productively, and took "final warnings" very lightly. Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 19:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your very valid attempts, but I am going to be merciful to everyone else and block you anyway. Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 18:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

someone unblock me please! i have done nonthing wrong! and can someone please report him to someone for unlawful blocking please!
 * I think most people here agree with this block, and you were warned multiple times without much response. If you desire an official second opinion from another admin, use this template: . That's all you can ask for. Leebo T  / C  18:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

There are plenty of other websites that might benefit from your knowledge of anime: http://en.anime.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page and http://anime.mikomi.org/ for example. Or you can start your own website. But you have demonstrated over the period of two months that Wikipedia cannot benefit from your edits. Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 23:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

PLEASE give me a nother chance! I will change i can do better edits i will do my best just please im sorry please! i beg of you! dear sweet mother of neko give me a chance!--Lolicon3043910 13:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please try another website. Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 15:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

why is it so damn hard to understand i am different?! I have done extensive research for several articals! Info not even known by wiki,hell the info shocked me to death! Is there anything at all i can do to at least,consider letting me back or can i convence you is there way? is it info you want i got info for the articals Alot! I sware to nekoconeko i will NOT EVER get in troble with ANYBODY EVER AGAIN, please have sympathy for me please it wont happen again what do you have to lose but a secend! The past few days I've done a lot of hard thinking about the things i did. I mean it from the bottom of my heart. I know that it will be very difficult for you to accept my apology, but I want you to think about it!

my edits is too valuable to lose over a silly mistake. I feel that I could have handled the situation in a better way, but you never gave me a chance to show you ive changed.. I admit that I was wrong for to say stupid things, go off topic, mainly working on my user page, and not do a lot of edits. I want you to know that I am very sorry!! I think that I have made a change. Please belive me please.--Lolicon3043910 17:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is information you came up with yourself, rather than being from a reliable source, we cannot use it. If you want to do original research and publish it yourself, you need to do this on your own personal website, rather than on Wikipedia.  Friday (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

no this info is from me researching things on anime & orther animes! Please let me back! --Lolicon3043910 17:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Even if you to swear on nekokoneko, your mew unblock request probably cat not be granted. There is nothing in your contributions to prove you have even tried. - Wo o  ty   Woot?   contribs  18:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * well can i make a new wikipage? --Lolicon3043910 18:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There are anime wikis and other sites with more lax standards than Wikipedia where you will probably be more productive. It is apparent that your style of community interaction is not cohesive with Wikipedia's goals of making a reliable encyclopedia. Leebo T / C  18:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes but this site is...GREAT! Most popular site on the web lots of people! but can i still make a new account?--Lolicon3043910 18:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Creating an alternate account to evade a block or ban is not allowed. Your new account would be immediately blocked if it was found that you did that. Regarding your point about what makes Wikipedia great... this site is not about interacting with people. It's necessary to interact with people in order to build an encyclopedia, but it's a secondary aspect. There are other social sites if it's interaction that you desire. Leebo T / C  18:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * ok i understand! dont worry i will try not to make a new account but tell me one thing, will i ever have this account open?--Lolicon3043910 18:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Your block is indefinite, meaning it will never end unless an administrator unblocks you. Here's my suggestion - take a break from Wikipedia for a good, long while. If you ever feel like coming solely to contribute to the encyclopedia (not to socialize or rant about child porn), then come back and give a calm, mature, well-written unblock reason. If that doesn't sound like something you want to do, you should consider the time of editors like us who are trying to handle this. There are people who are receptive to suggestions that need help instead. Leebo T / C  19:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

yes sr, ill comeback in....a month if im alive! untill then bye friend!--Lolicon3043910 15:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

WTF
Does this site want info or not?! I never read in the rules anything saying no overdetailed info!!! There are MANY unap. things on this site!!! I DID NOT KNOW IT WAS BAD!!! and i just said im changed!!! --Lolicon3043910 16:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The whole "being indefinitely blocked" thing should have been your clue you are not welcome to edit here under any name or any circumstances. - Wo o  ty   Woot?   contribs  17:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * We always want constructive edits, Woot?. If you return after a while with a totally different attitude, make constructive edits and stay far away from topics like lolicon and Saikano, and behave more calmly on talk pages, then we might even not know it's you.
 * I don't think that will happen for a while, so let's do an experiment: Contribute something new and interesting here on the talk page and say which article you want it to go in, then somebody might add it and credit you. --GunnarRene 19:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * For the love of... why are ya doing this to me?! I have done some MAJOR research as User:saikano real MAJOR!!! What in the hell do I have to do to at least have ya consider giving me a chance? Do you want me to donate money to wiki? What in the hell! ITS NOT LIKE IM VANDALISEING WIKI OR THREATING ORTHERS!!! so whats the problem? Im no threat!!! I may have acted and edited like an ass but i am changed!!! Im controling my anger, i have been doing MAJOR reasearch on the web and all over chesapeake, i have even talked to very importian people like My fav. Chris Hansen, Dr.Drew and striker(loveline), I have even been asking the freaking police department questions!!! We had a police officer die in a police chase just 2miles from me! I will write about him! I will go door to freaking door asking people there experinces with tornados in chesapeake!!! Its not that hard people!!! I am even involved in a Internet Project with small group of sites and one doctor!!! When its over ill write about that!!! Just give me a chance!!! Its obv. I am beging you!!! WHATS THERE TO LOSE?! goodneko please at least consider it!--Lolicon3043910 16:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Show us what content you've got, we'll go from there. Most of what you're talking about doing is called "original research" and isn't something we can use here. Show us your actual research and if it's useful, we'll look for a way to use it. Fair enough? Until then, what is there to talk about? Friday (talk) 16:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * im confused! i dont know if your saying if i have good enought research ya will consider un blocking me or your saying you will take my research and post it on wiki! If the 2nd one is the case then just shoot me!--Lolicon3043910 16:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You say your anger is under control, but your previous message is full of exclamation points and ALL CAPS words. That kind of attitude is difficult to work with, and it's disruptive. Also, you've threatened people as recently as a couple weeks ago, so to say that you've changed sounds empty considering your past responses to our requests. Just yesterday you left a hostile message accusing someone of insulting Jimbo Wales, and they seemed pretty confused about what you were talking about. I think you are going to have difficulty contributing collaboratively even if you have information to provide. Your discussions with other editors almost always turn hostile.  Leebo  T / C  16:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

If you were to demonstrate that there's a reasonable chance you could contribute constructively, there's a good chance someone unblock you. So far, you've just been demonstrating that you can act like a child and throw tantrums. I'll not respond here further unless it's to give feedback on whatever research you produce. Friday (talk) 16:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Im back i asked the committee if what info is ok to relese to the public for now and I have it! Its not really detailed because i shouldn even be telling wiki bout it but...if ya can shut up and not tell anybody i can get more! without puting the Project at risk!

It is a Project i created and it is a real project! The committee inv. Dr.Drew(loveline) Chris Hansen and several sites I am not aloud to say yet! I know i know, "how did you contact them?" and ill tell you...no never mind i cant...but if you can shut it then ill tell you!*im in trouble* Dr.Drew has a myspace and Im comf. if Chris Hansen has a myspace(because I found 2 well detailed myspaces with Chris Hansens picture and past life!) the sites i just emailed the chairman of the sites and they agreed to help! If you want proof of the project them wate untell we finish building it! is that ok or is "THAT" illegal on wiki?!--Lolicon3043910 16:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia can't be the first place to write about anything. As an encyclopedia, we're a little further removed from the "real world" than that.  We use information that has already been published in a reliable source.  So, research for Wikipedia involves using other sources, not doing your own first-hand interviews with people, for example.  This is what the no original research policy is about.  Whether you agree with them or not, on Wikipedia you're stuck with these policies.  Friday (talk) 17:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * RELIABLE? What do you want me to do? tell Chris Hansen to contact you? im not makeing this up! WHO IN THE HELL SAID IT WAS EVEN SICKO RELATED???!!! IT ISNT RELATED TO THAT KIND!!! belive it or not! --Lolicon3043910 17:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) Stop throwing tantrums. 2)  Read the policies I linked to.  3) Come back when you have research  appropriate for Wikipedia.  This means using sources.  Friday (talk) 17:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * well if it help at all i just reported a website that had child porn(softcore, thank god) and also who in the hell is that ann. user posting on your page w/o signing it! Trace him and ill handal it from there!--Lolicon3043910 17:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

If you think that ann. user is me think again! Im not that type!!! Please tel me you dont think is me!--Lolicon3043910 17:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

return?
I have got some new research(not orginal research) for saikano, lolicon, just to name a few! So what next?--Lolicon3043910 16:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)