User talk:Sailorsun

Astrology Allegory
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Astrology Allegory, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ascendinglight.com/astrology/allegory.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome...

Hello, Sailorsun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. I know you've been here awhile, but you haven't been formally welcomed. The links above are very helpful. Also, I turned your newly created article Sygyzy, into a redirect to the correct spelling, Syzygy, where there is already an article. Again, welcome! First Light (talk) 03:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC) First Light (talk) 03:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Carduus benedictus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Carduus benedictus was changed by Sailorsun (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-07-14T15:44:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Dispenza
A tag has been placed on Joe Dispenza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 04:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Joe Dispenza
I have nominated Joe Dispenza, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Joe Dispenza. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  ttonyb (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi
See the Emporio2012 case in Wikipedia en español. I saw your case and I'm interested in yours also. I'm reporting cases. --Hermana Clausa (talk) 15:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review ? Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion ?
Which is the place to ask for reassess of an article I made that was deleted? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joe_Dispenza

Thanks Sailorsun (talk) 02:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * That would be Deletion review. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much :) Sailorsun (talk) 02:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Error
I noticed you created a page in error... so I added this template to erase it. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Dispenza prefix:Wikipedia:Deletion review


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Huon (talk) 04:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Cairns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daybreak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Trilithon
I've reverted you. We never put links in section headings, and in any case the link fails our criteria for reliable sources at WP:RS (besides being wrong, we have a pretty good idea how these stones were moved). Dougweller (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oksa Pollock


The article Oksa Pollock has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTABILITY not asserted

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)