User talk:Saj.ravin

October 2021
Hello, I'm Blue Square Thing. Your recent edit(s) to the page Shardul Thakur appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''The source cited in the infobox is clear that he is a Bowler. Unless you have alternative, reliable sources to contradict this, don't change it.'' Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I've just reverted edits of yours which have done the same thing on three other cricketer article. Please stop doing that - it's disruptive and non-productive. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Per the above, you are deliberately and continually changing player's roles without adding alternative sources. Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

3RR

 * Please go and read WP:3RR NOW - it's important and you're about to fall foul of it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

But why?


 * Because you've made the same edit three times already and were about to do so for fourth time. The edits you're making are a) contrary to the source cited in the infobox - if you have reliable sources which suggest Thakur is an all-rounder than provide them (here is probably the best place) and we can consider the best way forward - but we'd be looking for more than an odd news report from a tabloid - what do Wisden say, for example, or the BCCI?; b) the external link you're adding simply isn't appropriate - it fails WP:ELNO and strikes me as rather tabloid in nature. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

a) https://www.colorframes.com/sports/post/shardul-thakur-the-perfect-allrounder-in-the-2023-world-cup/1314 b) https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/he-is-the-allrounder-india-are-hoping-hardik-pandya-to-be-twitter-goes-crazy-as-shardul-thakur-hits-2nd-fifty-of-the-match-against-england-at-oval-101630853834792.html c) https://crickettimes.com/2021/09/indian-all-rounder-shardul-thakur-shares-his-reaction-over-lord-shardul-memes/ d) https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/shardul-thakur-emerging-batting-rounder-130420308.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABTzu5MGYaeC4HHucKb7rppNGT5OtlVVzcXwqOgvtG_K3p9FkhNE6gA__VdgtAm3VGeslNCWZ_7mzRTbr-_88it-wUBwyB6m57vkwjIGte2Un-CMhAiy2PogwpAV2wMncdIOsYEPpY_0wHyaCr4xZVPqxN61f8NmxySI0SMBVU7O e) https://sportscafe.in/cricket/articles/2021/oct/20/t-20-world-cup-2021-shardul-thakur-is-very-similar-to-lord-ian-botham-says-michael-vaughan f) https://zeenews.india.com/cricket/exclusive-shardul-thakur-and-bhuvneshwar-kumar-should-make-india-s-playing-xi-vs-pakistan-says-mohammad-kaif-2404793.html


 * Thank you. Once I get a chance I'll work through and then see if I can add a reference or two - you need to learn how to do that, so what what I do so you can learn a way of doing so. It will probably take me a day or so - maybe a little longer. I am slightly concerned, however, that this article by Wisden, for example, suggests Thakur, for example, is rather less of an all-rounder. So we'll have to see. But that's a start - now relax, because this will take a little bit of time to deal with. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Cheers bruh. Don't stress it. Saj.ravin (talk) 17:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)