User talk:Saketace

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Wildlife Protection Act, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://indianngos.com/issue/environment/tiger/wildlifeprotectionact1972.htm. As a copyright violation, Wildlife Protection Act appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Wildlife Protection Act has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Wildlife Protection Act. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Wildlife Protection Act, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. —Whomp  [ T ] [ C ]  04:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Max Balaji Hospital
A tag has been placed on Max Balaji Hospital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Max Balaji Hospital is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template  to the page and leave a note on Talk:Max Balaji Hospital, explaining how Max Balaji Hospital is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.Seraphimblade 09:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Patparganj
A "" template has been added to the article Patparganj, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding 17:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)