User talk:Sakhawatay

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sakhawat Ali (November 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Storchy were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sakhawat Ali and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sakhawat_Ali Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Storchy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sakhawat_Ali reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Storchy (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sakhawat Ali


A tag has been placed on Draft:Sakhawat Ali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Zorya&#39;s Leshak (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022


Hello, Sakhawatay. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft:Sakhawat Ali has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject  and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is  here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE  and on IRC chat  Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: YourGuide (November 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:YourGuide and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:YourGuide Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:YourGuide reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:YourGuide


A tag has been placed on Draft:YourGuide, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Zorya's Leshak▲ (-10.0) 01:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)


 * This is an reputeable organization i fulfill all requirements Sakhawatay (talk) 13:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Turab Randhawa


A tag has been placed on Draft:Turab Randhawa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Zorya's Leshak▲ (-10.0) 01:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Sakhawatay. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 02:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Sorry
I've been using Wikipedia since 2017 but never edited. When I started editing I was new to it and wasn't aware of much of it's policies. I tried to add some missing pages and contribute on few but got banned. I am sorry I was newbie and couldn't understand it properly how it works. Can I get second and last chance?

Thank you! Sakhawatay (talk) 22:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Instructions on how to request an unblock are provided above. However, to stand a reasonable chance of being unblocked, I advise you to first follow the advice to read the guide to appealing blocks, and then think very carefully about what to write. Saying that you didn't realise that what you were doing violated Wikipedia policies won't carry much conviction, considering the number of messages about the issues involved which were posted both to this account and to another one, operated either by you or by someone working with you. JBW (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Instead of following this advice and appealing your block, you have instead chosen to create new accounts to evade it. Now that you have been caught doing this three times, you are banned from English Wikipedia per WP:3X. Girth Summit  (blether)  10:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

is closed. No idea when last sock edited -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Please list all of your other accounts and accounts you have coordinated edits with. Your last sock that I know of was blocked in April, so you are not eligible for consideration until October at the earliest. You are banned by the community because of al the block evasion/sock puppetry, so your unblock request will (eventually)  need to be carried to the community for discussion at WP:AN. Please read the Guide to Appealing blocks carefully first. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * PS: The "I didn't know any better," excuse rings hollow by now. Please don't bother with it any more. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, I get it. I'm so naive. Per Sockpuppet investigations/Sakhawatay/Archive, your last known sock was blocked in June. (So you seek unblock via this account in July. Charming) You are not eligible for unblock consideration till after December 16, 2023. Please do not worsen matters by further block evasion/sock puppetry. Please post no further unblock requests until you've gone at least six months without evading your block/socking.Thanks --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)