User talk:Sakimonk/Archive 1

<span style="display: inline-block; -webkit-transform: rotate(-5deg); -moz-transform: rotate(-5deg); -o-transform: rotate(-5deg); transform: rotate(-5deg); position: relative; left: -4em; bottom: -4em; white-space: nowrap; background-color: rgba( 215,231,244, 0.65); border: 1px solid #18a0ec; border-radius: 0.5em; -moz-border-radius: 0.5em; -webkit-border-radius: 0.5em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -moz-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -webkit-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); display: inline-block; margin: 0.5em 0 1em; padding: 0.5em 0.8em 0.5em; font-variant: small-caps;" title="Add new messages at the bottom of the page"> —Welcome to my talk page, Please start new sections at the bottom  <span style="display: inline-block; text-align: center; position: relative; top: 1em; right: -2em; margin-left: -2em; -webkit-transform: rotate(5deg); -moz-transform: rotate(5deg); -o-transform: rotate(5deg); transform: rotate(5deg);  padding: 3px 4px 6px; background-color: rgba( 243,243,243, 0.65); border: 1px dotted Red; border-radius: 0.25em; -moz-border-radius: 0.25em; -webkit-border-radius: 0.25em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.25em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -moz-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.25em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -webkit-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.25em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);">  Saki  Monk   21:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC) Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Tim Vickers (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Faerie's aire and death waltz
A tag has been placed on Faerie's aire and death waltz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; RHaworth 18:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Libyan woman.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Libyan woman.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Sudais
Everything in the article is cited to reliable sources and is directly related to the notability of the individual. Removal of such information is considered a violation of Wikipedia's policies WP:NPOV. If you have issues with specific statements in the article that you believe are not in accordance with Wikipedia policies, please bring them up on the talk page. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 02:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have responded on my talk page to keep the conversation in one place. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Amen
The word certainly has Aramaic connections, but unfortunately for you, the idea that the word as it is used in the Jewish Bible has equal and parallel Aramaic and Hebrew origins is not very credible, while the idea that the Arabic language had significant direct influence on Biblical Hebrew religious terminology is laughable. If people who know more about the details of a subject than you do are telling you that something is not accurate or helpful, then that's usually a useful warning sign. AnonMoos (talk) 08:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Good work
Those of us who no longer have the time to bring some objectivity to articles on Islamic topics appreciate those of you who do have the time, and use it wisely. Keep up the good work. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Your recent editing history at Wahhabi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. David 1217 02:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks I realise this hence why I am making a new section on the Talk page to prevent this continuing. My reversions were intended to enforce WP:NPOV as there was consistant violations from Organometalic1 regarding his edits which User talk:Mark Arsten is also concerned about. Thanks very much Sakimonk (talk) 02:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Be careful about 3RR, some admins are very strict about it, others will be more understanding. So the user came right back and started again after his block expired? It might be a good idea to directly contact the blocking admin in this case in lieu of filing another 3RR report, although that's not a bad idea either. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Wang Zi Ping2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wang Zi Ping2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Athari Edit
Sakimonk, i think your wrong in asserting that I vandalised the athari page. I created the page, which was vandalised by others who clearly (prob like yourself) have assumed wahhabs views are also athari - they are clearly NOT - and at best you should have objectively stated that this is disputed. It seems like there a concerted campaign from misinformed individuals to assert this incorrect info onto wiki. Sad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivegoturnumber (talk • contribs) 22:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Lady Godiva (song)
It makes perfect sense to merge them. The Alex Day is a cover. They do sound alike, don't they? --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 22:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "Perfect sense" to you is not the same for me. Please understand that Wikipedia is impartial and covers and originals are not one and the same. Sakimonk (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I had commented on the talk page for Lady Godiva (song), but apparently you did not see it. Consensus on Wikipedia has determined that originals and covers of the same song should not be split into separate articles. Please read WP:SONGS where it says: "When a song has renditions (recorded or performed) by more than one artist, discussion of a particular artist's rendition should be included in the song's article (never in a separate article)". See Without You (Badfinger song) and Kansas City (Leiber and Stoller song) as examples. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 06:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been taken to the appropriate WikiProject at WT:SONGS. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 10:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * And further to the above conversation I have re-merged the two articles. Not sure there was anything to discuss. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for the barnstar. I couldn't believe that the same user was back so quickly. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * That's what you call perseverance I guess! It's a shame it wasn't put to much good :) Sakimonk (talk) 04:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and the page is semi-protected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Great news, thanks very much for being so prompt. Sakimonk (talk) 03:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Politicized Disruptive Edit claim
Sakimonk, you replaced dates in an article with an incoherent mess of "CE" and "AH" dates which would lead to persons being born around 700CE and dying around 760AH. That is well over 700 years old. When I reverted this, you got very angry and posted that I am being disruptive. I understand that you are biased and have personal, political interest in replacing commonly-accepted dating with Islamic dating, but that is no excuse for factual error and animus when you are called out on it. Please do not disrupt anymore. 184.77.173.64 (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * To be clear, even Abu Hanifah's page says he died in 148 AH, or 767 AD. So please read that page before you start going crazy and claiming I am being disruptive.
 * Thank you, your recent corrections, while still censoring out important information, is at least now mathematically correct. 184.77.173.64 (talk) 19:50, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

following my edits is against wiki policies
do you understand? Baboon43 (talk) 02:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Baboon43 (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Al-Ahbash. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SudoGhost 23:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Retirement
Well I'm sorry to see you go but it is certainly understandable. Being at university and working in a contentious area is not the kind of stress you need. I hope that sometime you will be able to return. Good luck with your studies. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Hello, Sakimonk. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- McKhan (talk)

Retirement
You will be missed. MezzoMezzo (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Ahbashism_campaign
You are more than welcome to help with Ahbashism_campaign as keep on pushing his Al-Ahbash POVs on all the Al-Ahbash related pages. Thank you. McKhan (talk)

File source problem with File:Wang Zi Ping2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wang Zi Ping2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Athari article
Dear Sakimonk, it would be my pleasure to help on the Athari article so please do let me know if I can be of any assistance. Regards. Mbcap (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits on Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais
Hello. You removed large sections of text which were properly sourced and cited, and which directly relate to the subject's notability—especially as it relates to the Enlish-language WIkipedia project. Please review the five pillars of Wikipedia, especially those that relate to the point-of-view from which articles need to be written and the prohibition against original research. Subsequent violations of Wikipedia policies and guidelines may require measures to be taken to protect the integrity of the project. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Please be careful, you appear to be starting an edit war on Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais. Please respond to my explanation of why your edits are incorrect on the talk page before blindly reverting again. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 19:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Ambox notice.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Attention requested on Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais regarding the edits of User:Sakimonk.  Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 19:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Please note that continued edit-warring will get you blocked. Please stop edit-warring, go to the talk page of the article and discuss the issue refraining from personal attacks.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

DS alert
&#8220;WarKosign&#8221; 20:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

1RR
All articles related to the Israeli-Arab conflict are subject to a 1RR limitation. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Arab-Israeli_Arbitration_Enforcement. The relevant part, bolded for you, reads: "All articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed, are under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related. . your recent edits on Israel have broken this 1RR. I suggest you stop edit warring over there. Brad Dyer (talk) 00:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Got to be kidding me
Following your edits? It seems more like your following mine. If you do not stop labeling movements as sect I will report you myself. Misdemenor (talk) 21:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mujaddid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andalusian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Qadiani
Dear Sakimonk, Qadiani is a religious slur and therefore shouldn't be added as you did here to the lede on Ahmadiyya just like we don't add the N word in articles. Thanks. --Peace world  18:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Qadian is a city... Qadianis come form Qadian. You guys have made up that it's a slur, it's the most common phrase. The only reason you don't like it is because you don't want people to know that the only people in the world following qadianism are a bunch of people who live in like one or two cities.  Sakimonk   talk  23:15, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mujaddid. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --MelanieN (talk) 19:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

August 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, you may be blocked from editing.  --Peace world  10:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

template:islam
In order to make this template Funtional you need to modify the following line as follows:
 * | listnames = beliefs; practices; texts; history; Classical denominations; Other denominations; culture; related
 * since you have split denominations into Two-parts as Classical denominations & Other denominations

Could you read my Comments for this template on template talk:islam
Please read my comments for this template on Yazdânism, Bahais and Druses ..
 * Yazdânism & Bahais shouldn't be on this template.

68.100.166.227 (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * You don't believe me, ask/read Ibn Taymiyyah..68.100.166.227 (talk) 04:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, you have contributed to Athari a lot, and to ʿAqīdah three years ago. But you should tell this clearly on the page User:Sakimonk.
 * Moreover, you should correct template:islam by deleting Yazdânism & Bahais.. Perhaps, consider putting Druses..

That's my suggestion..68.100.166.227 (talk) 04:57, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Classical denominations; Other denominations;
Done  Sakimonk   talk  05:54, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

In order to make this operational the template Documentation should be modified as:   | listnames = beliefs; practices; texts; history; Classical denominations; Other denominations; culture; related  

{{Documentation | content = {{Islam|all}} {{Collapsible lists option | listnames = beliefs; practices; texts; history; Classical denominations; Other denominations; culture; related | example = practices }}

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Peace world  10:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Last Warning
If you edit my talk page comments I will report you. I have enough evidence of you deleting talk page comments. Misdemenor (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That's because you keep leaving horrible comments calling people kafirs for no reason!  Sakimonk   talk  02:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Athari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zahir. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

TBD
Oh using IP address's now are we? Mr SoapBoxer. 216.177.129.165 (talk) 01:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * What are you talking about?  Sakimonk   talk  05:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by TBD and what edits are you talking about. I don't soapbox and I've actually worked with administrators to catch soapboxers.  Sakimonk   talk  05:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi
Dear friend, I hope you are well. Please forgive me if I seem demanding, but please could you substantiate your claim that the word "sect" represents a neutral point of view. IMHO it seems to introduce needless subjectivity. I may be wrong, but please could you explain a bit further and maybe reference your assertion. Thank you and regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 17:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I didn't say "sect" alone is NPOV but including both "movement or sect" is closer to a balanced POV. Please don't reinstate the edit without a discussion on the talk page.  Sakimonk   talk  17:14, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

template:Aqidah
template is not working properly. please try not to destroy the template completly When you make a change on the template68.100.166.227 (talk) 02:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I'll fix it.  Sakimonk   talk  02:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Fixed.  Sakimonk   talk  02:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

ahmad ibn Hanbal
you have added his name with some other persons names, but as you know he is the founder of a madhhab.. So now you are deleting it.. He is not an imam of either aqidah-madhhab or theological madhhab. 68.100.166.227 (talk) 02:37, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * -.- are you being serious? Imam Ahmed rahimahullah spent his life in jail because of his work upholding sunni theology and the Athari school is part and parcel of the Hanbali madhhab - the hanbali madhhab is distinct because it incorporated theology into it as well! Imam Ahmed is the patronym of the hanbali madhhab and he is also one of the leaders in the athari school of divinity (sunni theology)! I just removed the names because it was cluttering the template and not needed because people can read about each school and find names.  Sakimonk   talk  02:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Latter-Day
people might get confused about Latter Days and Latter-Day Saints in the other islam template.. 68.100.166.227 (talk) 02:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

For your info, the founding imams of Athari are
Founding imams of Athari
 * 1) Abd al-Rahman al-Awza'i
 * 2) Al-Layth ibn Sa'd
 * 3) Sufyan al-Thawri

Ibn Qudamah is a really key figure too. JazakAllahu khair for your edits. Can you move the schools to below the five pillars though because it would look nicer and to show that they are independent to the sects listed below? Sakimonk   talk  10:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * "Aqidah schools of divinity" section moved into/under "Five Pillars of Islam" section as requested by you.68.100.166.227 (talk) 19:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

reflist
68.100.166.227 (talk) 03:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Morphine. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 19:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

change in the title pages
When you make a change in the title next time please redirect pages aw well properly..68.100.166.227 (talk) 21:35, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, have you done it?  Sakimonk   talk  21:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

hey
I just added the archive header to the archive you just set up. On this page, I set up an archiving bot and an archive box so you don't have to manually archive and provide links to archived talk pages. the bot will take care of everything for you. if you don't like that stuff feel free to revert me. Jytdog (talk) 21:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Wow, thank you very much!  Sakimonk   talk  22:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * you are welcome! WP:ARCHIVE is a place you can learn more if you like ... Jytdog (talk) 22:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

WARN
NO MORE SWITCHING TO OLD VERSION WARNING WARNING 216.177.129.238 (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Template:Islam. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Take it to the talk page. Drmies (talk) 05:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please use the article talk page to discuss your edit
Please could you use the article talk page to discuss your edit to the article on Wahhabism. In your edit summary you wrote that "Sunnah.org has been discredited as a reliable source a multitude of times". You might want to review your position on this edit (or even self-revert). See WP:SELFSOURCE.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Toddy1, that's seems reasonable, however I would really prefer if an alternative source were used. I'm planning on adding some reliable text on opposition using George Halverson's Political Sunni'ism if that's okay? In the mean time you can revert it if you want? It's up to you I don't mind either way.  Sakimonk   talk  18:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That seems a good way ahead.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Contests
User:Dr. Blofeld has created WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Libya Wikiproject revamp
Hello, I am very knowledge able about the Middle East and MENA and its conflicts. I was very surprised to see that Wikiproject:Libya was not entirely as interactive and attractive as Wikiproject:Syria or Wikiproject:Israel and others for that matter. Please send me a message on your take or ideas on the matter, and if you want to join in. Max Pigeon (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list