User talk:Sal Chicho

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Pietro Scalia
If the boom shots are obvious, it seems like they should have been noted by somebody. It would be remarkable that such a major film could have so many boom shots, unless it was intentional for some reason, and in either case you would expect it to get discussed in film journals. Otherwise it seems like you are conducting original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. The film itself is a primary source, and should be used with care; secondary sources are more appropriate. Also, it seems like it would be more (or at least as) relevant to the article on the film, is it mentioned there? The subject is also a living person, so there is a policy on Wikipedia intended to prevent slander, which demands good sourcing for all such claims. Also, you should clarify that you don't mean boom shot, which seems to be something else. I haven't seen the film myself so I can't comment on whether they are there or not. Rigadoun (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ibi Kaslik b+w.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ibi Kaslik b+w.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Ibi Kaslik 2008.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Ibi Kaslik b+w.jpg. The copy called Image:Ibi Kaslik b+w.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 19:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ibi Kaslik 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ibi Kaslik 2008.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)