User talk:Salamalet Yigit22

Care in use of templated messages
I see that at Draft:Villain Boys you posted a "uw-draftfirst" template. That made no sense at all, as the page is a draft, and you were suggesting making a draft instead. Please be careful to check the text of any templated message you are thinking of posting, and post it only if it is appropriate. Also, messages to editors should normally go on their user talk pages, not on other pages that the messages refer to. JBW (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Carolyn Johnson Woodruff for deletion
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Carolyn Johnson Woodruff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carolyn Johnson Woodruff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  scope_creep Talk  18:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello Salamalet Yigit22. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Cesar Ricardo Cruz, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Salamalet Yigit22. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Kuru  (talk)  02:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Please also identify your relationship with the account. Thanks.  Kuru   (talk)  02:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cesar Ricardo Cruz
Hello, Salamalet Yigit22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cesar Ricardo Cruz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)